Substance: The Foundation to Aristotle’s Metaphysics.

Tabifor Pride Asongwe; Prof. Valentine Banfegha Ngalim; Dr. Nelson Shang

doi:10.18535/sshj.v8i03.975

Abstract

This article explores an inquiry into substance as the foundation of Aristotle’s metaphysics. An analysis of the statue of matter is look at and also the nature of form. It uses elements like: intrinsic animator of nature, the fundamental recruiter, the fundamental character and the pincher of nature that explains the essence of things in light of matter and form. These elements bring the interaction between matter and form and posit that it is centered on the laws of nature. The main argument is that substance is foundational to Aristotle’s metaphysics. The possible solutions to the plaque affecting the society are considered.

Keywords

SubstanceAristotle’s MetaphysicsHylemorphismThe Intrinsic Animator of NatureFundamental RecruiterFundamental CharacterThe Pincher of Nature

References

ALVIRA THOMAS et Al., Metaphysics, Sinag-Tala Publishers, Manila 1982.Google Scholar ↗
ARISTOTLE, Categories, (ed.) JONATHAN BARNES, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1991Google Scholar ↗
ARISTOTLE, Metaphysics, (ed) JOHN WARRINGTON, Jim and Sons Ltd, London 1956.Google Scholar ↗
BLACKBUM, SIMON, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, New York, Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar ↗
BURNET, JOHN, Greek Philosophy: Thales to Plato, Macmillan University Press, London, 1914.Google Scholar ↗
CHAUCER, GEOFFREY, The Canterbury Tales, George Routledge and sons, London, 1867.Google Scholar ↗
DE TORRE, JOSEPH Christian Philosophy, 3ed, Sinag-Tala Publishers, Manila.Google Scholar ↗
F. LITTLE, EDWARD Two Essays on the Organs of Metaphysics, U.S.A Writers club Press, 1996.Google Scholar ↗
MACDONALD, SOPHIA, Greek Philosophy, Great Britain, London, 2009.Google Scholar ↗
O’CONNO R, D.J, “Substance and Attribute,” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 8.Google Scholar ↗
SKEAT, W.W, A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1911.Google Scholar ↗
W.K.C GUTHRIE, W.K.C, A History of Greek Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1962.Google Scholar ↗
http://www.medias-press.infos, 16/01/2024, 2:25am.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-1] ALVIRA THOMAS et Al., Metaphysics, Sinag-Tala Publishers, Manila 1982.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] ARISTOTLE, Categories, (ed.) JONATHAN BARNES, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1991Google Scholar ↗

[refR-3] ARISTOTLE, Metaphysics, (ed) JOHN WARRINGTON, Jim and Sons Ltd, London 1956.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-4] BLACKBUM, SIMON, The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, New York, Oxford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] BURNET, JOHN, Greek Philosophy: Thales to Plato, Macmillan University Press, London, 1914.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] CHAUCER, GEOFFREY, The Canterbury Tales, George Routledge and sons, London, 1867.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-7] DE TORRE, JOSEPH Christian Philosophy, 3ed, Sinag-Tala Publishers, Manila.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-8] F. LITTLE, EDWARD Two Essays on the Organs of Metaphysics, U.S.A Writers club Press, 1996.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] MACDONALD, SOPHIA, Greek Philosophy, Great Britain, London, 2009.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] O’CONNO R, D.J, “Substance and Attribute,” in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 8.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] SKEAT, W.W, A Concise Etymological Dictionary of the English Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1911.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] W.K.C GUTHRIE, W.K.C, A History of Greek Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1962.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] http://www.medias-press.infos, 16/01/2024, 2:25am.Google Scholar ↗