Exploring the Impact of Son Preference on the Well-being of Daughters in Tanzania: A Multifaceted Analysis

Elinami Nasari; Rehema J. Magesa

doi:10.18535/sshj.v8i03.962

Abstract

In Tanzania, entrenched cultural norms favoring male offspring significantly influence family dynamics and pose considerable challenges to the well-being of daughters. This phenomenon, known as son preference, manifests in biased resource allocation, limited educational opportunities, and distinct healthcare differentials. This study delves into the multifaceted consequences of son preference on Tanzanian daughters, particularly in the Arusha Region. The cultural roots of son preference in Tanzania can be traced to historical and societal norms, where male heirs are traditionally viewed as primary caretakers and providers for aging parents. This mindset leads to biased resource allocation, impacting daughters' access to essential resources such as education, healthcare, and nutrition. Educational disparities are particularly pronounced, limiting girls' prospects and perpetuating gender-based inequalities in the workforce. The study employs a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative data collection and analysis. It adopts a descriptive survey design, conducted in all seven district councils of Arusha Region. Both probability and non-probability sampling techniques are applied to select respondents, encompassing young women, girls, and stakeholders from various organizations. Results indicate a prevalent acknowledgment of son preference, particularly in pastoralist and agro-pastoralist communities. The study reveals how son preference affects education, health, and economic opportunities for daughters. Educational disparities, early marriage, unequal access to health care, and limited economic prospects are identified consequences. To address these challenges, the study emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach involving changes in societal attitudes, policies promoting gender equality, and initiatives to empower girls. By challenging ingrained cultural norms, fostering educational opportunities, and ensuring equal access to healthcare, Tanzania can work towards dismantling barriers hindering the potential of its daughters. The study contributes to the discourse on gender equality, advocating for interventions that ensure the holistic development and flourishing of Tanzanian daughters.

Keywords

SonSon PreferenceDaughtersGender equalitySocietal norms

References

Adhikari B. M. (2013). Gender inequality and the problem with girls’ school attendance in nepal: a qualitative perspective of patriarchal Nepalese practice. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for The Degree of Master in Social Work with a Comparative Perspective, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nordland, Norway. Available at:Google Scholar ↗
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/225898245.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
Aurino E. (2017). Do boys eat better than girls in India? Longitudinal evidence on dietary diversity and food consumption disparities among children and adolescents?Google Scholar ↗
DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2016.10.007.Availableat https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27810442/DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Baker M. and Kevin M. (2013). Boy-Girl Differences in Parental Time Investments: Evidence from Three Countries. Working Paper 18893. DOI 10.3386/w18893, Available atDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
https://www.nber.org/papers/w18893Google Scholar ↗
Barcellos S. H., Leandro S. C., and Adriana L.-M. (2014). Child Gender and Parental Investments in India: Are Boys and Girls Treated Differently? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. Vol. 6, no. 1, January 2014 (pp. 157-89). Available atGoogle Scholar ↗
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.6.1.157DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Caner A., Cahit G., Cagla O., and Seyhun O.S. (2015). Gender Roles and the Education Gender Gap in Turkey. Soc Indic Res (2016) 129:1231–1254. DOI 10.1007/s11205-015-1163-7. Accepted: 23 October 2015 / published online: 3 November 2015. Springer Science+ Business Media Dordrecht 2015DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
Cochran W. (1977). Sampling Techniques. (3rd Ed.).John Wiley and Sons, Harvard University, New York. Pp 72 – 76.Google Scholar ↗
Cronk, L. (1991). Preferential parental investment in daughters over sons. Human Nature 2 (4):387-417.Google Scholar ↗
Cronk L. (2008). Intention versus behaviour in parental sex preferences among the Mukogodo of Kenya. Journal of Biosocial Science. Volume 23: (02), 229 – 240.Google Scholar ↗
http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0021932000019246. Reviewed on the 15th May 2023.Google Scholar ↗
El-Gilany A.H. and Shady E. (2007). Determinants and causes of son preference among women delivering in Mansoura, Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2007 119.Google Scholar ↗
Kien L., and My N., (2022). Son Preference and Health Disparities in Developing Countries. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112348/MPRA Paper No. 112348, posted 11 Mar 2022 11:13 UTC. Available atGoogle Scholar ↗
https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112348/1/MPRA_paper_112348.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
Jayachandran, S. (2015). The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Economics, 7(1), 63-88.Google Scholar ↗
Jayachandran, S., & Kuziemko, I. (2011). Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1485-1538.Google Scholar ↗
Magesa R. J. (2021). The Impact of Human Trafficking on Young Female Lives; The Case of Arusha Region. A Thesis Submitted In Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Open University of Tanzania.Google Scholar ↗
Mugenda, O.M. and Mugenda, A.G. (1999) Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Acts Press, Nairobi.Google Scholar ↗
UN (1979). Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (art. 5 (a)), adopted by General Assembly resolution 34/180 of 18 December 1979.Google Scholar ↗
World Bank (2018). Student learning outcomes in Tanzania’s primary schools: Implications for secondary school readiness. Washington, DC, World Bank. Avaiable atGoogle Scholar ↗
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/356111553606355438/pdf/Gender-Equity-and-Fee-Free-Basic-Education-in-Tanzania.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-1] Adhikari B. M. (2013). Gender inequality and the problem with girls’ school attendance in nepal: a qualitative perspective of patriarchal Nepalese practice. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for The Degree of Master in Social Work with a Comparative Perspective, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Nordland, Norway. Available at:Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/225898245.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-3] Aurino E. (2017). Do boys eat better than girls in India? Longitudinal evidence on dietary diversity and food consumption disparities among children and adolescents?Google Scholar ↗

[refR-4] DOI:10.1016/j.ehb.2016.10.007.Availableat https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27810442/DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] Baker M. and Kevin M. (2013). Boy-Girl Differences in Parental Time Investments: Evidence from Three Countries. Working Paper 18893. DOI 10.3386/w18893, Available atDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] https://www.nber.org/papers/w18893Google Scholar ↗

[refR-7] Barcellos S. H., Leandro S. C., and Adriana L.-M. (2014). Child Gender and Parental Investments in India: Are Boys and Girls Treated Differently? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics. Vol. 6, no. 1, January 2014 (pp. 157-89). Available atGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-8] https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/app.6.1.157DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] Caner A., Cahit G., Cagla O., and Seyhun O.S. (2015). Gender Roles and the Education Gender Gap in Turkey. Soc Indic Res (2016) 129:1231–1254. DOI 10.1007/s11205-015-1163-7. Accepted: 23 October 2015 / published online: 3 November 2015. Springer Science+ Business Media Dordrecht 2015DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] Cochran W. (1977). Sampling Techniques. (3rd Ed.).John Wiley and Sons, Harvard University, New York. Pp 72 – 76.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] Cronk, L. (1991). Preferential parental investment in daughters over sons. Human Nature 2 (4):387-417.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] Cronk L. (2008). Intention versus behaviour in parental sex preferences among the Mukogodo of Kenya. Journal of Biosocial Science. Volume 23: (02), 229 – 240.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0021932000019246. Reviewed on the 15th May 2023.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-14] El-Gilany A.H. and Shady E. (2007). Determinants and causes of son preference among women delivering in Mansoura, Egypt. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2007 119.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-15] Kien L., and My N., (2022). Son Preference and Health Disparities in Developing Countries. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112348/MPRA Paper No. 112348, posted 11 Mar 2022 11:13 UTC. Available atGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-16] https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/112348/1/MPRA_paper_112348.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-17] Jayachandran, S. (2015). The roots of gender inequality in developing countries. Economics, 7(1), 63-88.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-18] Jayachandran, S., & Kuziemko, I. (2011). Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1485-1538.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-19] Magesa R. J. (2021). The Impact of Human Trafficking on Young Female Lives; The Case of Arusha Region. A Thesis Submitted In Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of The Open University of Tanzania.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-20] Mugenda, O.M. and Mugenda, A.G. (1999) Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Acts Press, Nairobi.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-21] UN (1979). Convention on The Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (art. 5 (a)), adopted by General Assembly resolution 34/180 of 18 December 1979.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-22] World Bank (2018). Student learning outcomes in Tanzania’s primary schools: Implications for secondary school readiness. Washington, DC, World Bank. Avaiable atGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-23] https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/356111553606355438/pdf/Gender-Equity-and-Fee-Free-Basic-Education-in-Tanzania.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗