Abstract
Rapid urbanization alters links between the urban and rural areas and uses resources carelessly, destroying peri-urban areas. This situation is made worse in India especially due to lack of a legal structure to plan and manage the transformation of PUAs. In the context of peri-urban planning, the ecosystem services model's assessment of the environment's carrying capacity tend to have a major impact on maintaining the ecology as well as the economy of rural and urban areas thereby enhancing human well-being. To support the sustainability of Indian cities, this study provides an ecosystems-based integrated strategy to environmental conservation-management and peri-urban development. The "Expert matrix technique" is used in a situation where there is a lack of data to generate a general, qualitative assessment of the potential for multiple ecosystem services. By utilizing the data acquired from the Expert matrix technique over different time periods, the potential for numerous ecosystem services in the research area was mapped. The findings offer insightful information for land developers and urban planners on the trade-offs between spatial design and ecological preservation to achieve sustainability.
References
- Burkhard B et al, (2012), Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets, Ecological indicators, 21, pp. 17-29Google Scholar ↗
- Campagne CS et al, (2017), Expert-based ecosystem services capacity matrices: Dealing with scoring variability, Ecological Indicators, Elsevier, 79, pp.63-72, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.043, hal-01681625DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Chandra M, (2015), Environmental concerns in India: Problems & solutions, Journal of International Business and Law, Volume 15, Issue 1, Article 1, Available at:http://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/jibl/vol15/iss1/1Google Scholar ↗
- Fu B & Chen L, (1995), Landscape diversity types and their ecological significance. Acta Geogr Sin 15(4):343–350Google Scholar ↗
- Groot RD & Hein L, (2007), Concept and valuation of landscape functions at different scales, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007% 2F978-3-540-36763-5_2#citeas.Google Scholar ↗
- Heymans A et al, (2019), Ecological Urban Planning and Design: A Systematic Literature Review, Sustainability 2019, 11, 3723; doi:10.3390/su11133723, MDPIDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Ismail Haque & Priyank Pravin Patel (2017): Growth of metro cities in India: trends, patterns and determinants, Urban Research & Practice, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2017.1344727DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Jacobs et al (2015) ‘The Matrix Reloaded’: a review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecological Modelling, 295, 21–30.Google Scholar ↗
- Liu YL et al (2012) Evaluation of agricultural ecosystem services in fallowing land based on farmers’ participation and model simulation. Paddy Water Environ 10, 301–310 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10333-011-0282-2DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Maes J et al (2012) Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union, Ecosystem Services, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pgs. 31-39Google Scholar ↗
- Marshall F et al (2017) Why peri-urban ecosystem services matter for urban policy(steps-centre.org/publication/peri-urban-ecosystem-services-matter-urban-policy), produced for the ESPA “Risks and responses to urban futures” (NE/L001292/1)project.Google Scholar ↗
- Ranganathan T & Pandey G (2018) Who leaves farm land fallow and why? An empirical investigation using nationally representative survey data from India. The European Journal of Development Research, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-018-0139-2DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi K. (2022) Assessing the Role of Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Resilience and Climate Change Adaptation. In: Loon L.Y., Subramaniyan M., Gunasekaran K. (eds) Advances in Construction Management. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 191. Springer, Singapore.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5839-6_2DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2021a) ‘Assessing the Relationship between Urban Planning Policies, Gender and Climate Change Mitigation: Regression Model Evaluation of Indian Cities”, Journal of Urban Planning and Development. ASCE, Vol. 147 (4). Paper ID: 05018005. pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000440.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2021b) “Assessing the Potential of Urban Voids in Promoting Resilient and Livable Sustainable Cities”. gis.Science - Die Zeitschrift fur Geoinformatik. Wichmann Verlag. 3/2021. ISSN: 1869-9391. (Scopus Indexed)Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi K (2021c). Analytical framework for integrating climate change mitigation and adaptation in local urban planning policy. Iberoamerican Journal of Development Studies 11(1):156-181. ISSN: 2254-2035. DOI: 10.26754/ojs_ried/ijds.665 (Scopus Indexed)DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2020a) “Investigating Open Space Reservation as the New Urban Commons: A Case of Chennai City”. Nagarlok Quarterly Journal of Urban Affairs. Vol. LII, pp. 57-67. ISSN-0027-7584.Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2020b) “Ability of Nature Based Solutions through Urban Green Space Management in Building Urban Resilience”. International Journal of Urban Design. Vol 3: Issue 2, pp.46-56.Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2018) ‘Assessing the Role of Urban Planning Policies in Meeting Climate Change Mitigation Goals in Indian Cities’, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, ASCE, Vol. 144 (4), 2018. Paper ID: 05018005. pp. 1-16. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000440.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2016a) ‘Assessing Climate Change Planning in Indian Cities: Bridging the Gap between Climate Change Research and Practice’, Social science and Humanities Journal, ISSN: 2456 - 2653 Vol. 1 (3). pp. 160-174.Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2016b) ‘Assessing the Initiatives in Climate Responsive and Energy Efficient Architecture: Bridging the Gap between Architectural Research and Practice’, International Journal for Science and Advance Research in Technology, ISSN: 2395-1052 Vol. 2 (6). pp. 94 -101.Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2015) ‘Analyzing the Relationship between Environmental Planning Policies and Climate Change: Multinomial Logit Regression Model Evaluation of Tarrant County, Texas’, Current Urban Studies, Scientific Research Publishing, Vol. 3 (1) pp. 1-10.Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2014a) ‘Assessing Smart Growth Strategies in Indian Cities: A Grounded Theory Approach to Planning Practice’, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, ASCE, Vol. 141 (4). Paper ID: 05014031. pp. 1-10. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000267.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Raparthi, K. (2014b). Impact of urban planning policies on carbon-dioxide 1444 emissions, an Indian perspective. Ph.D. thesis. Univ. of Texas at 1445 Arlington, Arlington, TX.Google Scholar ↗
- Silva EA et al (2008) Strategies for landscape ecology: An application using cellular automata models, Progress in Planning 70, pgs 133-177Google Scholar ↗
- Subekti RM & Suroso DSA (2018) Ecological Footprint and Ecosystem Services Models: A Comparative Analysis of Environmental Carrying Capacity Calculation Approach in Indonesia. in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 012026. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012026DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Syrbe R et al, 2017, What to Map?, In book: Mapping Ecosystem ServicesChapter: 5.1Publisher: Pensoft Publishers Editors: Benjamin Burkhard, Joachim Maes, pgs 151-157MEA 2005Google Scholar ↗
- Tripathi YC & Tripathi G (2003), Some important environmental problems in India and their remedies In: Kumar A (ed) Dimensions of Environmental threats, Daya publishing house, DelhiGoogle Scholar ↗
