ISSN 2456-2653
Contact us
Social Science and Humanities Journal
ISSN 2456-2653
Submit Paper
server-injected
Open Access

Influence of Childhood Environmental Factors on Prisoners: An Ecological Systems Approach

DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v9i12.2134· Pages: 9650-9672· Vol. 9, No. 12, (2025)· Published: December 31, 2025
PDF
Views: 381 PDF downloads: 231

Abstract

Childhood is a critical stage of development that shapes emotional stability, social behaviour, and long-term life outcomes. Adverse childhood experiences and environmental factors increase vulnerability to substance abuse and criminal behaviour. Guided by Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory, this study examines the influence of childhood environmental factors on prisoners with a history of drug addiction, focusing on interactions across the Microsystem, Mesosystem, Exosystem, Macrosystem, and Chronosystem. A descriptive survey design with a qualitative component was employed. A sample of 57 prisoners from an open prison camp in Kandy was selected based on the central limit theorem. Data were collected using a self-administered structured questionnaire aligned with the five ecological systems and supplemented by semi-structured interviews. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained prior to data collection. Findings indicated that drug-related imprisonment occurred across all religious groups. Most respondents had low educational attainment, with the majority completing schooling only up to Grade 9, and were engaged in realistic jobs. The results demonstrate that imprisonment is the outcome of multiple interconnected childhood influences rather than a single factor. At the Microsystem level, family support, teachers, religious education, and access to medical care exerted positive influences, while peers and neighborhoods environments showed negative effects. Mesosystem interactions, particularly parent–teacher communication, were weak and inconsistent. Exosystem factors such as parents’ work conditions, school administration, economic challenges, and healthcare access negatively affected well-being. At the Macrosystem level, cultural and social influences were uneven, with limited access to technology and weak community organizational support. Chronosystem analysis revealed that personal and family-level transitions had a stronger influence than broader national or environmental events. Statistical analysis confirmed significant differences among the ecological systems (Friedman χ² = 153.045, df = 4, p < .001). The microsystem recorded the highest mean rank (4.49), indicating the strongest influence, while the Mesosystem recorded the lowest mean rank (1.60), and reflecting weak or uneven support. Pairwise comparison tests identified statistically significant differences in six out of ten system comparisons. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening protective childhood environments across all ecological levels to reduce substance abuse and criminal involvement.

Keywords

Childhood environmentecological systems theory

References

  1. Anuradha, R. G. (2023). Impact of prisoner population on the prison rehabilitation process in Sri Lanka. Vidyodaya Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(1), 39–48.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Astridge, B., Li, W., McDermott, B., Longhitano, C. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis on adverse childhood experiences: Prevalence in youth offenders and their effects on youth recidivism. Child Abuse & Neglect, 140. DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106055DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Baglivio, M. T., & Epps, N. (2016). The relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and Juvenile Offending trajectories in a juvenile gffender sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.04.012DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six Theories of Child Development (pp. 187–249). Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An Interactionist Perspective on the Socioeconomic Context of Human Development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  7. DeLisi, M., Elbert, M., Caropreso, D., Tahja, K., Heinrichs, T., & Drury, A. (2017). Criminally explosive: Intermittent explosive disorder, criminal careers, and psychopathology among federal correctional clients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 16(4), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2017.1365782DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  8. Department of Prisons, Sri Lanka. (2024). Annual report of prison (2024): Prison statistics of Sri Lanka (Vol. 43). Statistics Division. http://prisons.gov.lk/web/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/prison-statistics-2024.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  9. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.xDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2015). Developmental and life-course theories of offending. In J. Morizot & L. Kazemian (Eds.), The development of criminal and antisocial behavior: Theory, research and practical applications (pp. 19–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08720-7_2DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  11. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., Koss, M. P., & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(98)00017-8DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Flynn, K., & Mathias, B. (2023). How am I supposed to act?: Adapting Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory to understand developmental impacts of multiple forms of violence. SAGE Journal, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584231159674DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Guy-Evans, O. (May, 2025). Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bronfenbrenner.htmlGoogle Scholar ↗
  14. Hawkins, J. D., Catalano, R. F., & Miller, J. Y. (2008). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 64–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.64DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  15. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.309DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  16. Masarik, A. S, & Conger, R. D. (2017). Stress and child development: A review of the family stress model. Current Opinion in Psychology,13, 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.008DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  17. Masten, A. S. (2014). Global perspectives on resilience in children and youth. Child Development, 85(1), 6-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12205DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  18. Masten, A., & Cicchetti, D. (2016). Resilience in development: Progress and transformation. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental Psychopathology (pp. 271-333). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy406DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  19. Messina, N., & Grella, C. (2006). Childhood Trauma and Women's Health Outcomes in a California Prison Population. American Journal of Public Health, 96(10), 1842–1848. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.082016DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Repetti, R. L., & Saxbe, D. E. (2019). The influence of chronic family stressors on adult health. In B. H. Fiese, M. Celano, K. Deater-Deckard, E. N. Jouriles, & M. A. Whisman (Eds.), APA Handbook of Contemporary Family Psychology: Applications and Broad Impact of Family Psychology (pp. 121–136). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000100-008DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. Smith, J. A. (Ed.) (2003). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage Publications.Google Scholar ↗
  22. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2018). World drug report 2018. United Nations.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Van der Kolk, B. (2017). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of Trauma. Penguin Books.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Viner, R. M., Ozer, E. M., Denny, S., Marmot, M., Resnick, M., Fatusi, A., & Currie, C. (2012). Adolescence and the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 379(9826), 1641–1652. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60149-4DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  25. Wang, M. T., & Degol, J. L. (2016). School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 28(2), 315–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9319-1DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  26. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Wickramatilake, C. M., De Silva, B., Nanayakkara, T., Nanayakkara, R., & Gayashani, K. P. K. (2023). General health characteristics, psychological stress of inmates and living environment of a main prison in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Medicine, 32(1), 41–47.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Enoka Randeniya
Department of Education Psychology Faculty of Education University of Colombo, Sri Lanka
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →