ISSN 2456-2653
server-injected
Open Access

Effects of Quay Transfer Accidents on Port Operations Performance at Dar Es Salaam Port

,
DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v10i01.2060· Pages: 9783-9794· Vol. 10, No. 01, (2026)· Published: January 15, 2026
PDF
Views: 411 PDF downloads: 204

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of quay transfer accidents on port operations performance at Dar es Salaam Port, Tanzania’s principal maritime gateway and a strategic node in East and Central Africa’s trade corridors. Despite ongoing modernization, the port experiences frequent operational disruptions arising from quay-side incidents during cargo handling, which significantly undermine efficiency, safety, and economic performance. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative data from structured surveys and official records with qualitative insights from interviews, focus group discussions, and field observations. Findings reveal that human error, mechanical equipment failure, unsafe working conditions, and administrative inefficiencies are key contributors to accidents, leading to prolonged ship turnaround times, cargo damage, revenue loss, increased insurance claims, and reputational decline. The analysis, grounded in Risk Management Theory, Systems Theory, and the Swiss Cheese Model, highlights the systemic nature of these disruptions and the inadequacy of reactive safety measures. Although safety regulations are in place, weak enforcement and limited investment in modern handling technology and predictive maintenance exacerbate operational vulnerabilities. The study concludes that without strategic interventions including continuous workforce training, digital monitoring systems, equipment upgrades, and institutional safety culture reforms quay transfer-based accidents will continue to impede port performance and limit Tanzania’s trade competitiveness. By bridging empirical data with theoretical insights, the study not only offers practical recommendations for enhancing safety and efficiency at Dar es Salaam Port but also contributes a replicable framework for accident mitigation and performance improvement in similarly constrained ports across the Global trade.

Keywords

Quay transferPortPerformanceAccidents

References

  1. Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (2021). Understanding port safety and operational efficiency: A case study of Long Beach Port, USA. Journal of Maritime Safety and Logistics, 15(3), 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsl.2021.03.005DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  2. Chen, X., & Li, H. (2021). Advancements in port safety and accident prevention: A study of Singapore Port. International Journal of Maritime Research, 12(4), 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/IMR.2021.04.012DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  3. Ghosh, R., Wang, T., & Yang, L. (2022). Automation and AI-driven safety strategies in modern port operations: The case of Hamburg Port, Germany. Maritime Economics & Safety Journal, 19(2), 89-106. https://doi.org/10.1108/MESJ-02-2022-0075DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  4. Issa, F. H., & Masanja, E. P. (2022). Change for performance improvement in the Tanzania Ports Authority, a public sector organization in Tanzania. International Journal of Public Leadership, 18(4), 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-12-2021-0061DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  5. Joppe, M. (2015). The validity and reliability of research instruments in social science studies. Journal of Social Research Methods, 9(1), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsrm.2015.01.005DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  6. Kiogora, T., Onwuegbuchunam, D. E., & Cherigui, A. (2022). Port safety management in East Africa: Challenges and opportunities for Mombasa and Dar es Salaam ports. African Journal of Maritime Studies, 7(1), 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/AJMS.2022.07.001DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  7. Masuruli, E. N. (2021). Establishment of factors affecting port infrastructure asset maintenance management in Tanzania: The case of Dar es Salaam Port. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/53122153Google Scholar ↗
  8. McLaughlin, K., Sarkar, B. D., & Shankar, R. (2020). Assessing risk factors in Canadian port operations: A focus on Vancouver Port’s accident mitigation strategies. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 14(3), 192-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtl.2020.03.007DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  9. Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2021). Port governance and efficiency: Lessons from Rotterdam Port. European Journal of Maritime Economics, 18(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/EJME.2021.08.003DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Okpara, G. (Ed.). (2022). Effect of cargo handling equipment on performance of Onne and Calabar in Nigeria (Vol. 4). Godson Okpara.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Onwuegbuchunam, D. E., Okeke, K. O., Aponjolosun, M. O., Igboanusi, C., & Nwosu, A. C. (2021). Utilization of cargo handling facilities in Nigerian seaports and its implications for operational efficiency. Open Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 11(4), 143-157. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojsst.2021.114010DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  12. Péry, D., Narasimha, L., Vuddaraju, R., Etchevers, I. C., & Tassabehji, R. (2021). Reducing maritime accidents in ships by tackling human error: A bibliometric review and research agenda. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 6(20), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-021-00098-yDOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  13. Phan, T. M., Thai, V. V., & Vu, T. P. (2020). Port service quality (PSQ) and customer satisfaction: An exploratory study of container ports in Vietnam. Maritime Business Review, 6(1), 72-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-01-2020-0003DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  14. Salumu, H. (2019). Road accidents in Tanzania: Causes, impact, and solutions. Global Scientific Journals, 7(5), 752–772. Retrieved from https://www.globalscientificjournal.comGoogle Scholar ↗
  15. Suleiman, M. (2016). Pragmatic analysis of safety and security in Tanzania maritime logistics: Evidence from Zanzibar passenger ferry boat, Tanzania. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/27007426Google Scholar ↗
  16. Tengecha, N., & Zhang, X. (2020). Status, constraints and strategies of marine traffic flow on Dar es Salaam Port, Tanzania. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352144088Google Scholar ↗
  17. Turof, M. (2016). Determination of risk factors in generating work accidents in port operating. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets, 11. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49450c1e310b389e59a052173df43683461125aeGoogle Scholar ↗
  18. Uchechukwu, J. (Ed.). (2025). Advancing maritime operations: Sustainable practices and enhanced safety protocols for global shipping (Vol. 25). Joy Publications.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Vitalis, N., Runyoro, A. K., & Selemani, M. (2022). Assessing factors for occurrence of road accidents in Tanzania using panel data analysis: Road safety perspective. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 12(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2022.121008DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  20. Wang, M. (2019). Bayesian model for constructing factors affecting ship accidents and accident consequences. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 7(9), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.79013DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  21. Wu, X., Zhang, Y., & Li, Z. (2020). The role of workforce training in mitigating quay transfer-based accidents: A study on Shanghai Port. Asian Journal of Maritime Safety and Operations, 16(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/ajmso.2020.02.009DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  22. World Bank. (2022). Striving to Become the Regional Port of Choice. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.orgGoogle Scholar ↗
Author details
Ramadhani J. Bundala
Department of Science and Management, 1/19 Sokoine Drive, Dar es Salaam,Tanzania
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →
Prof. Eliamin A. Kassembe
Lecturer, Department of Science and Management, 1/19 Sokoine Drive, Dar es Salaam,Tanzania
👤 View Profile →