Abstract
This paper explores the revivalist political culture inspired by a Democratic Communication Ethos that the people endorsed through the Sri Lankan National Uprising of 2022. Witnessing the actions of a passionate people across social classes, it was evident that extremely right wing Neo-liberal as well as Marxist inspired communication methods used by the political establishment and the anti-establishment are no longer appealing to an aggrieved people who need constructive solutions to their real life problems. For instance, Pacifist values appealed to protestors even when the government of President Gotabhaya Rajapaksa had violated the Public Trust in line with his Manifesto, undermining credibility of democratic governance. Such a violation meant that the regime was indifferent to the growing socio-economic woes of the people, undermining the livelihoods of key segments of the economy like teachers, fishermen, farmers and even senior citizens, who were impoverished overnight with bankruptcy of the economy. This study examines the scope for a transformative dialogue leading to a New Social Contract as the pathway to restore the socio-political fabric of Sri Lanka, with a resilient, just, and equitable social order for the future.
Keywords
References
- Abeyratne, U. (2017), “Authoritarian trends and their continuity in Sri Lankan politics: A study of operationalizing of authoritarianism from 2005 to 2015 Period”, in African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, Vol.11(1), pp. 6-12.Google Scholar ↗
- Anwar, A. (2022), Family Ties Led to Sri Lanka's Collapse. What Does This Mean for South Asia?, Council on Foreign Relations: New York BAIOCCHI,Google Scholar ↗
- Biyanwila, S. J. (2023). Debt Crisis and Popular Social protest in Sri Lanka: Citizenship, Development and Democracy Within Global North–South Dynamics. Emerald: London.Google Scholar ↗
- Chapman, B. (2014), St. Thomas and the Common Good, in Dominicana, Dominican House of Studies, Washington D.C.Google Scholar ↗
- Doyle, M and Sambanis, N. (2000), International Peacebuilding: A Theoretical and Quantitative Analysis, in American Political Science Review, vol. 94, issue 4, pp.779-801.Google Scholar ↗
- Fernando, J. (2023), The citizen’s uprising in Sri Lanka: A watershed moment against racial capitalism in Sage Journals, Volume 16, Issue 2, Sage: LondonGoogle Scholar ↗
- Gianpaolo, A, (2003). “Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment”, in Archon FUNG and Erik O. WRIGHT (eds.). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso, pp. 45-76Google Scholar ↗
- Gurnham, D, (2022), Introduction: Marginalisation in law, policy and society, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.Google Scholar ↗
- Hattotuwa, S, (2003), Media and Conflict in Sri Lanka, Center for Policy Alternatives, Colombo.Google Scholar ↗
- Jayamaha, J, (2022), “Youth Uprising Movements in Sri Lanka in 2022”, in Vol.1(07), July 2022, pp, 360-3 66, Sprin Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, Spring Publishers, India.Google Scholar ↗
- Kastning, T (2013), Basics of Social Democracy, Publushed by Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, GermanyGoogle Scholar ↗
- Mendis, M, (2002), The Press and the Politics of Conformity and Dissent, Unpublished Ph.D Dissertation, National University of SingaporeGoogle Scholar ↗
- Ramesh, R, (2017), “Does Trust Matter? An Inquiry on Citizens - Trust in Public Institutions of Sri Lanka”, in Millennial Asia Volume 8, Issue, (2):123-145, Sage: LondonGoogle Scholar ↗
- Rouet, G. (2024). Citizens and Public Administrations: Focus on Human Relations Rather Than Trying to Rehumanize Procedures. In: Rouet, G., Raytcheva, S., Côme, T. (eds) Ethics and Innovation in Public AdministrationGoogle Scholar ↗
- Rösel, J. (2017), Elites and Aristocracy in Colonial and Post-colonial Sri Lanka, Heidelberg Asian Studies Publishing: GermanyGoogle Scholar ↗
- Shyamika Jayasundara-Smits, (2023), Political Patronage: Underbelly of Everyday Politics, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.Google Scholar ↗
- Survey on Democracy and Reconciliation in Sri Lanka (2024), Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA), Lanka News Web Colombo .Google Scholar ↗
- Social Scientists’ Association. (2022), The democratic moment today: A call for action and reflection.Google Scholar ↗
- Timberman, (2025), The Aragalaya Protest Movement and the Struggle for Political Change in Sri Lanka, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace: Washington.Google Scholar ↗
- Young, T. R, (1985), The Structure of democratic communication, in Mid American Review of Sociology, Vol. 10, No. 2 (WINTER 1985), pp. 55-76 (22 pages), published by Social Thought and ResearchGoogle Scholar ↗