Abstract
Maritime security is a critical component of national security, and effective information sharing among government agencies is essential for preventing and responding to maritime threats. This article examines the existing legal frameworks governing maritime security information sharing in Mainland Tanzania, with a focus on identifying gaps and challenges that hinder the sharing of critical information. Through a doctrinal analysis of relevant laws and regulations, including the Merchant Shipping Act 2003, the Tanzania Shipping Agency Corporation Act 2017, the Ports Act 2004, Regional agreements and international conventions such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, and SOLAS Convention under Chapter XI-2 International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. This article argues that Tanzania's legal frameworks require strengthening to facilitate seamless information sharing among government agencies. The article proposes recommendations for law reform and capacity building to enhance maritime security information sharing, ultimately contributing to the safety and security of Tanzania's maritime domain.
Keywords
References
- Africa Center for Strategic Studies, “Trends in African Maritime Security,” Spotlight, 15 March 2019, https://africacenter.org/spotlight/trends-in-african-maritime-security/ (Accessed 8th August, 2021).Google Scholar ↗
- Alfred Mwango Charo, role of maritime policies and strategies in shaping the maritime security threats in KenyaGoogle Scholar ↗
- Alfred Thayer Mahan 1660-1783, The Influence of Sea Power Upon HistoryGoogle Scholar ↗
- Anil Jai Singh (2022) UNCLOS: Facilitating Ocean governance and maritime security, Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 18:1, 72-90, DOI: 10.1080/09733159.2022.2097643DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Bendera, I. (2017). Admiralty and Maritime Law in Tanzania. Nairobi, Kenya: Law Africa Publishing (K) Ltd.Google Scholar ↗
- Convention for the Suppression of UnlawfulGoogle Scholar ↗
- Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf.Google Scholar ↗
- Djibouti Code of Conduct/Jeddah Amendment on Standard Operation Procedures for the Regional Maritime Information Sharing, October 2023Google Scholar ↗
- Dmitry, January 4, 2025, United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS): Governing Oceanic Jurisdictions.https://maritimepage.com/united-nations-convention- on-the-law-of-the-sea-unclos/Google Scholar ↗
- Dr. Hiacinter B. Rwechungura, Tanzania’s Legal Regime for Combating the Threat of Piracy, A Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Open University of Tanzania, 2022Google Scholar ↗
- Hovell, D., The Authority of Universal Jurisdiction, European Journal of International Law,2018, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy037.DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- International Ship and Port Facility Security Code and SOLAS amendments 2002, ISPS Code 3rd edition 2003Google Scholar ↗
- Natalie Klein, “Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea” (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar ↗
- Sam Bateman, “India and Regional Security Activities,” in Anit Mukherjee and C. Raja Mohan, editors, India’s Naval Strategy and Asian Security (New York: Routledge 2016) pp. 215- 236.Google Scholar ↗
- Strengthening Maritime Security: Best Practices for the DCoC/JA RegionGoogle Scholar ↗
- Suk Kyoon Kim, Chapter 2 Legal Framework for Maritime Safety and Security and IMO Law making. Global Maritime Safety and Security Issues and East Asia, Volume 8, 2019Google Scholar ↗
- Unites Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), 1982Google Scholar ↗