ISSN 2456-2653
server-injected
ArticlesOpen Access

Proposed Program for Green Governance and Environmental Reforms in Urban and County Areas at Guangdong Province, China

DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v9i05.1835· Pages: 7860-7901· Vol. 9, No. 05, (2025)· Published: May 7, 2025
PDF
Views: 218 PDF downloads: 135

Abstract

As urbanization accelerates, the pressure on local governments to manage environmental resources efficiently has increased. Qingyuan, with its blend of urban centers and rural counties, faces unique challenges in balancing economic growth with environmental sustainability. This has driven the need for public institutions to adopt governance models that integrate environmental priorities at the heart of policy-making processes.

A key driver for these reforms is the rising concern over pollution, particularly air and water quality issues. Guangdong Province has seen significant industrialization, which has contributed to rapid economic growth but also caused environmental degradation. In Qingyuan, both the urban and rural areas are affected by emissions from factories, transportation, and construction activities. To address this, local governments are reforming institutions to ensure stricter enforcement of environmental regulations, focusing on areas such as pollution control, waste management, and emissions monitoring.

Another pressing issue is solid waste management. With increasing urban populations and industrial activities, public institutions in Qingyuan are under pressure to develop sustainable waste disposal and recycling systems. This requires not only technological innovation but also institutional reforms that encourage inter-agency coordination and partnerships with private sector actors. Policies promoting circular economies and community involvement in waste segregation are emerging as essential strategies to enhance environmental governance.

Keywords

e-governancetransparencyinclusivitydigital transformationpublic sectordigital literacy

References

  1. Allen, Mike (2017). Triangulation, retrieved:Google Scholar ↗
  2. https://methods.sagepub.com/reference/the-sage-encyclopedia-of-communication-research-methods/i14830.xmlGoogle Scholar ↗
  3. Andrew, Damon P.S, Pedersen, Paul M. and McEvoy, Chad D. (2013). Research Methods and Design in Sport Management, Human Kinetics: United KingdomGoogle Scholar ↗
  4. Bertin M., Bodin J., Fouquet N., Bonvallot N., Roquelaure Y. (2018) Multiple exposures and coexposures to occupational hazards among agricultural workers: A systematic review of observational studies.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Brownlee, Jason (2018, May 9). A Gentle Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics, retrieved:Google Scholar ↗
  6. https://machinelearningmastery.com/a-gentle-introduction-to-nonparametric-statistics/Google Scholar ↗
  7. Calmorin and Calmorin as cited by Gualin, (2021)Google Scholar ↗
  8. Castillo, Romer (2016, January 26). Who is Slovin and where and how did the Slovin's Formula for determining the sample size for a survey research originated? retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/post/Who-is-Slovin-and-where-and-how-did-the-Slovins-Formula-for-determining-the-sample-size-for-a-survey-research-originatedGoogle Scholar ↗
  9. Cherry, Kendra (2020, March 20). How to Identify and Calculate the Mean, Median, and Mode, retrieved: https://www.verywellmind.com/how-to-identify-and-calculate-the-mean-median-or-mode-2795785Google Scholar ↗
  10. Chip Stapleton, (2023) What Methods Are Used to Launder Money?Google Scholar ↗
  11. Crossman, Ashley (2017, March 2). Understanding Purposive SamplingGoogle Scholar ↗
  12. Chen B. (2017) Framework of China’s rural environmental governance theory under rule of law.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Du Y. (2019) The Change of China’s Rural Environmental Governance from 1949 to 2019: Basic History, Transformation Logic and Future Trend.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Du Y., Liu N., Chen L. (2021) An Analysis of Farmers’ Collective Inaction in Rural Environmental Governance and Its Turning Logic.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Guo X., Li Y. (2021) Function of Alienation and Path of Realization in the Public Legislative Participation.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Hasler B., Termansen M., Nielsen H (2022) , Daugbjerg C., Wunder S., Latacz-Lohmann U. European agri-environmental policy: Evolution, effectiveness, and challenges.Google Scholar ↗
  17. He W., Tang J. (2022) “Idling” of rural environmental Policy and its Correction—Based on fuzzy-conflict analysis Framework. J.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Heinen D., Arlati A., Knieling J. (2022) Five dimensions of climate governance: A framework for empirical research based on polycentric and multi-level governance perspectives.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Hao Z. (2022) On the Tool Innovation of Rural Environmental Governance: Taking Environmental Impact Bond as an Example.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Li M., Du W., Tang S. (2020) Assessing the impact of environmental regulation and environmental co-governance on pollution transfer: Micro-evidence from China.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Li N., Li Z. (2022) Construction of Modern Rural Environmental Governance System in the Context of Rural Revitalization.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Jiang Y. (2021) The Path of Realizing the Positive Interaction between Government Predominance and Farmers’ Participation in Rural Environmental Governance: Based on Action in the Perspective of ‘Embeddedness Theory’ J.Google Scholar ↗
  23. Lu N., Villa K.M. (2022) Agricultural support and contaminated spillovers: The effects of agricultural water pollution on adult health in China.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Liu L. (2029) Rural-urban inequities in deaths and cancer mortality amid rapid economic and environmental changes in China.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Mee Kam Ng (2017) Governing green urbanism: The case of Shenzhen, ChinaGoogle Scholar ↗
  26. Shen F., Chen X. (2021) Participatory Governance Path and Realization Mechanism of “Zero Pollution” Villages.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Staying Firmly Committed to Green Development (The State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China January 2023)Google Scholar ↗
  28. Wang F., Li N. (2021) Empowerment, Identification and Cooperation: Strategies for Participatory Governance in Rural Eco-Environment.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Wang S., Li J.(2020) On the Judicial Guarantee of Rural Environmental Governance in China.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Wang B., Che L., Dai C., Zheng L. (2022) Rural Domestic Sewage Governance: From Theory, Practice to Decision-making.Google Scholar ↗
  31. Wewerinke-Singh M., Doebbler C. (2022) Protecting Human Health from Climate Change: Legal Obligations and Avenues of Redress under International Law.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Xi J. (2017) Secure a decisive victory in building a moderately prosperous society in all respects and strive for the great success of socialism with Chinese characteristics for a new era.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Xu X. (2021) The evolution of governance model of rural public environmental sanitation and integration path of “three governancesGoogle Scholar ↗
  34. Xinhai Lu, Xiangqian Tao (2023) Local Government Environmental Attention and Urban Land Green Use Efficiency in China: The Intermediary Role of Industrial RestructuringGoogle Scholar ↗
  35. Yigang, Zhang , et al (2023) The Dilemma and Path of Rural Environmental Governance in China: From the Perspective of a Community with a Shared FutureGoogle Scholar ↗
  36. Zhang Y. (2021) Rural Environmental Governance under the Concept of a Community of Destiny.Google Scholar ↗
  37. Zheng S., Yao R., Zou K. (2022) Provincial environmental inequality in China: Measurement, influence, and policy instrument choice.Google Scholar ↗
  38. Zhu Z. (2023) Approaches and Mechanisms of Rural Living Environment Governance Under the Perspective of Everyday Life Governance.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Li Zhongyi
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →