Abstract
This study investigates the most frequent pronunciation errors in English vowels and consonants among 3rd-year English students at Dai Nam University, explores the potential causes of these errors, and proposes effective teaching methods to address these pronunciation challenges. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, quantitative data from recorded pronunciation tasks identified recurring errors, such as confusion between long and short vowels and substitutions for consonant sounds absent in Vietnamese phonology (e.g., /θ/ and /ð/). Qualitative data from interviews and focus groups suggest that these errors are influenced by phonological transfer effects from Vietnamese and a lack of awareness among students regarding the phonetic distinctions between Vietnamese and English. Focus group discussions with instructors highlight effective pedagogical techniques, including minimal pair drills, phonetic symbols, and visual aids, that address these specific pronunciation difficulties. The findings underscore the need for tailored pronunciation instruction that raises phonological awareness and incorporates structured practice, enabling Vietnamese EFL students to improve their pronunciation accuracy and confidence in English communication.
Keywords
References
- Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English Pronunciation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education.Google Scholar ↗
- Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A Course Book and Reference Guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar ↗
- Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second Language Accent and Pronunciation Teaching: A Research-Based Approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379-397.Google Scholar ↗
- Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Why is Pronunciation So Difficult to Learn? English Language Teaching, 9(3), 74-85.Google Scholar ↗
- Kang, O. (2010). The Effect of Rater Background and Training on the Rating of International Teaching Assistants' Oral Proficiency. Language Testing, 27(2), 235-253.Google Scholar ↗
- Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Morley, J. (1991). The Pronunciation Component in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 481-520.Google Scholar ↗
- Nguyen, N. (2010). The Acquisition of English Vowels by Vietnamese Learners. Second Language Research, 24(3), 451-477.Google Scholar ↗
- Nguyen, N., & Ingram, D. (2006). Vietnamese Acquisition of English Word-final Consonants: Investigation of Native Speaker Judgements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 3187-3197.Google Scholar ↗
- Nguyen, T. T., & Dinh, T. V. (2018). Phonological Interference of Vietnamese on English Pronunciation. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(4), 23-31.Google Scholar ↗
- Nguyen, N., & Macken, M. A. (2008). The Acquisition of English Vowels by Vietnamese Learners. Second Language Research, 24(3), 451-477.Google Scholar ↗
- Odlin, T. (1989). Language Transfer: Cross-Linguistic Influence in Language Learning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1), 209-231.Google Scholar ↗
- Swan, M., & Smith, B. (2001). Learner English: A Teacher's Guide to Interference and Other Problems. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2014). Pronunciation Instruction: A Research-based Approach. Language Teaching, 47(3), 340-366.Google Scholar ↗