ISSN 2456-2653
Contact us
Social Science and Humanities Journal
ISSN 2456-2653
Submit Paper
server-injected
ArticlesOpen Access

Factors Affecting the Growth of Tertiary Education Programmes at Namibia College of Open Learning

DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v9i03.1709· Pages: 7212-7224· Vol. 9, No. 03, (2025)· Published: March 6, 2025
PDF
Views: 323 PDF downloads: 176

Abstract

This study investigates the factors contributing to the slow growth of tertiary programmes at the Namibian College of Open Learning (NAMCOL). The research objective for this study was to determine the key factors contributing to the slow growth of tertiary programmes at the Namibia College of Open Learning. The study was conducted within the framework of an interpretivist research paradigm. The study employed a qualitative research design to offer a comprehensive and contextually nuanced examination of the factors influencing the slow growth of tertiary education programmes at the Namibia College of Open Learning. The population of the study included all 50 various stakeholders associated with NAMCOL's tertiary programmes. This includes academics and administrators involved in programme development and delivery, as well as relevant policymakers with insights into the higher education landscape in Namibia, with a sample of size of 9 participants who were purposively selected based on criteria such as their roles within NAMCOL, their involvement in tertiary programmes, and their perspectives on factors influencing slow growth at tertial institutions. Data collected from semi-structured interviews revealed financial constraints as a primary factor that impacts the development and delivery of tertiary programmes at NAMCOL. Limited financial resources at the institution level have resulted in an inability for the institution to pay multiple curriculum developers each year, contributing to the small number of tertiary programmes offered over the past 24 years. Additionally, the focus of NAMCOL's management strategy has been on secondary education, with financial and human resources disproportionately allocated to this area, hindering the expansion of tertiary offerings. The study also highlighted a shortage of human resources dedicated to both the development and implementation of tertiary programmes, which has led to slow progress in programme development and inadequate support for students. The lack of sufficient support to students has, in turn, increased student dropout rates and negatively impacted enrolment numbers. Furthermore, while marketing efforts exist, they predominantly target secondary education programmes and fail to attract a broader student base for tertiary offerings. The reliance on social media for marketing also excludes potential students in remote areas with limited internet access. Finally, the programme development process was found to be slow and inefficient, suggesting the need for a review and streamlining of procedures. The study concludes with recommendations for improved resource allocation, enhanced marketing strategies, and a more efficient programme development process to foster the growth of tertiary education at NAMCOL.

Keywords

FamilyFriendsInfluencesTeenageTraitsBehaviors

References

  1. Ajay, S., & Micah, M. (2014). Sampling techniques & determination of sample size in applied statistics research: an overview. 32-33.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Ali, W. (2020). Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: A necessity in light of COVID-19 pandemic. Higher education studies, 10(3), 16-25.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Australia: Cengage.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Baxter, J., & Eyles, J. (2018). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘rigor’ in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 13(2), 131-144.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Bhandari, P. (2022, January 17). What is qualitative research? Methods and examples. Retrieved from Scriber: tertiary programmess://www.scribbr.com/methodology/qualitative-research/Google Scholar ↗
  6. Chen, Y. (2021). "Strategic decision-making in programme development." Higher education quarterly, 75(1), 78-94.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Cope, D. G. (2014). Methods and meanings: Credibility and trustworthiness of qualitative research. Oncology Nursing Forum, 41-47. Retrieved from tertiary programmess://www.yourhomeworksolutions.com/up-content/uploads/edd/2018/02/methods_and_meanings_credibility_and_trustworthiness_of_Google Scholar ↗
  8. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Newbury Park.: Sage.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Doyle, L., Brady, A. M., & Byrne, G. (2009). An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 14(2), 175-185. doi:10.1177/1744987108093962DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  10. Dyer, J. (2021). "Curriculum development in higher education: Trends and innovations." Journal of Higher Education Research, 15(2), 45-58.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 17(3), 746.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Jena, P. K. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities created by Covid-19 for ODL: A case study of IGNOU. International Journal for Innovative Research in Multidisciplinary Field (IJIRMF), 6(3), 16-21.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Johnson, R. (2023). "Accreditation as a tool for program development." Review of Higher Education Policy and Practice, 14(2), 77-89.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Konyana, S. (2023). Postgraduate student recruitment strategies in a transforming higher education landscape, South Africa. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 12(2), 482-492.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Lau, K., & Sun, J. (2021). "Institutional bureaucracy and program development in higher education: A Case Study." Higher education policy, 44(3), 392-411.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Maringe, F., & Carter, S. (2021). "Financial sustainability in higher education: Challenges and strategic approaches." Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(2), 162-179.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Martin, R. (2023). "The role of faculty in programme innovation in higher education." Educational research review, 28(1), 112-128.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Science capital or STEM capital? Exploring relationships between science capital and technology, engineering, and maths aspirations and attitudes among young people aged 17/18. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(8), 122-1249.Google Scholar ↗
  19. NAMCOL. (2017). Annual Report 2016 - 2017. Windhoek: NAMCOL.Google Scholar ↗
  20. NAMCOL. (2020). Strategic Plan 2016-2020. Windhoek: NAMCOL.Google Scholar ↗
  21. NAMCOL. (2021). NAMCOL Strategic Plan 2021-2026. Windhoek: NAMCOL. Retrieved June 15, 2024, from tertiary programmess://namcol.edu.na/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/NAMCOL-Strategic-Plan-2021-2026.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
  22. NAMCOL. (2022). Annual Report 2021 - 2022. Windhoek: NAMCOL.Google Scholar ↗
  23. NAMCOL. (2023). Annual Report 2022 - 2023. Windhoek: NAMCOL.Google Scholar ↗
  24. National Council for Higher Education Secretariat. (2023). 11th NCHE Public Lecture ‘Enhancing Higher Education System Performance and Efficiency through Minimum Standards’. Windhoek: National Council for Higher Education (NCHE). Retrieved from tertiary programmes://www.nche.org.na/sites/default/files/documents/public_lecture_January_2025.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Nyangarika, A., & Bundala, F. S. (2020). Challenges facing administration system for quality improvement on odl programmes in Tanzania. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education, 6(2), 1259-1272.Google Scholar ↗
  26. Paulsen, J., & McCormick, A. C. (2020). Reassessing disparities in online learner student engagement in higher education. Educational researcher, 49(1), 20-29.Google Scholar ↗
  27. Ramirez, M. (2023). "Building industry partnerships in higher education: Strategies and benefits." Higher Education Quarterly, 77(1), 12-25.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. 8th ed. Pearson Education.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Seriki, O. (2023). Resource-Based View. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management (pp. 2776-2778). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Shabani, O., & Maboe, K. A. (2021). The effectiveness and efficiency of student support services in open distance learning institutions in Africa: A desktop review. African Perspectives of Research in Teaching and Learning, 5(2), 25-44.Google Scholar ↗
  31. Thomas, T. A., & Maree, D. (2022). Student factors affecting academic success among undergraduate students at two South African higher education institutions. South African Journal of Psychology, 52(1), 99-111.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Zongozzi, J. N. (2022). Accessible quality higher education for students with disabilities in a South African open distance and e-learning institution: Challenges. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 69(5), 1645-1657.Google Scholar ↗
  33. Zuhairi, A., Raymundo, M. R., & Mir, K. (2020). Implementing quality assurance system for open and distance learning in three Asian open universities: Philippines, Indonesia and Pakistan. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 15(3), 297-320.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Dr. Onesmus Aloovi Aloovi
Department of Technical and Vocational Education and Training Faculty of Commerce, Human Science and Education Namibia University of Science and Technology
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication