Abstract
Rather than simply reflecting on the origins of modernity, it is necessary to critically examine its main story by disseminating its underlying ideas throughout the world. Reevaluating the world through a different lens facilitates the deconstruction of the binary between the Global North and the Global South. This paper’s analysis scrutinizes the ideas introduced by the Moroccan philosopher Taha Abdurrahman in his work entitled "The Spirit of Modernity: A Prolegomenon to Laying the Foundations of Islamic Modernity." This paper illustrates the ability of Global South to offer a novel viewpoint. Taha Abdurrahman's critiques of what he terms "Islamic Alternative Modernity" through a methodology that integrates translation and discourse analysis. His authorship constructs a conceptual framework that interrogates the prevailing perceptions of Muslims within Western societies. The works of Abdurrahman offer profound insights into the modern Islamic landscape and the myriad perspectives that coexist within it. It encourages us to reflect on the forms in which one might achieve a deeper understanding of Islamic thought. According to the narrative, Taha Abdurrahman has remarkable contributions to be able to discern the complexities and contradictions within modern Western civilization, shaped by his post-colonial perspective. In exploring the nuances of contemporary thought, one must consider the alternative perspectives that challenge the prevailing notions of modernity. The spirit of this inquiry invites us to examine the significance of location in shaping and reshaping our experiences, particularly in relation to the Global North Grand narratives about the South. A critical analysis reveals the complexities of universality, urging us to question established paradigms and engage in thoughtful discourse about pluriversality.
Keywords
References
- Abdurrahman, T. (2006). Rūḥ Al-Ḥadātha: Al-Madkhal Ilā Ta’sīs Al-Ḥadātha Al-Islāmiyya. Casablanca: Al-Markaz Al-Thaqāfī Al-ʿarabī.Google Scholar ↗
- An-Naim, A. A. (2008). Islam and the Secular State: Negotiating the Future of Shari'a. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Anderson, P., (1998). The origins of postmodernity. London and New York: Verso. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar ↗
- Arnason, B. T. (2001). Modernity and revolution: A comparative analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. New York: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. USA: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Multiple Modernities. In Daedalus (Vols. 129–129, Issue 1, pp. 1–1)https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Multiple-Modernities-by-S.N.Eisenstadt.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
- Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar ↗
- Gaonkar, D. P. (Ed.). (2001). Alternative Modernities.UK: Duke University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. United Kingdom: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533-580.Google Scholar ↗
- Habermas, J. (1984) The theory of communicative action vol. 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Habermas, J. (1997). Modernity: An Unfinished Project. In M. P. Entrèves, & S. Benhabib (Eds.), Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity: Critical Essays on the Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (p. 38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Habermas, J. (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Hall, S., & du Gay, P. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar ↗
- Hallaq, Wael B. 2019. Reforming Modernity: Ethics and the New Human in the Philosophy of Abdurrahman Taha. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. Lovitt, W. (Trans.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar ↗
- Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002a). The Concept of Enlightenment. In Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments (pp. 1-34). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. (Originally published in 1947)Google Scholar ↗
- Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Lukács, G. (1971). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge: MIT PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Delinking: The rhetoric of modernity, the logic of coloniality and the grammar of de-coloniality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 449–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162647DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, Decolonial Options. Duke University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Ramadan, T. (2004). Western Muslims and the future of Islam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar ↗
- Sardar, Z. (1985). Islamic Futures: The Shape of Ideas to Come. Mansell Publishing.Google Scholar ↗
- Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. University of California Press.Google Scholar ↗