ISSN 2456-2653
Contact us
Social Science and Humanities Journal
ISSN 2456-2653
Submit Paper
server-injected
ArticlesOpen Access

High Risk Areas of Covid-19 Pandemic in UK: An Epidemiological and Spatiotemporal Analysis

DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v8i10.1344· Pages: 5188-5209· Vol. 8, No. 10, (2024)· Published: October 6, 2024
PDF
Views: 216 PDF downloads: 197

Abstract

Since the outbreak of Covid-19 the humanity has faced great global health crisis. Covid-19 have affected all countries of the world, causing thousands of deaths and economic hardships. In United Kingdom as well as other regions of the world, the virus is infectious to people of all aspects of life, social, political, economic as well as moral. The objectives of this study was to ) to understand the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 pandemic in UK; 2) to understand the spatiotemporal characteristics of COVID-19 pandemic in UK, and 3) to map out the high risk areas/regions of COVID-19 pandemic in UK. To achieve these objectives, a quantitative study was conducted using secondary data collected from various sources. The data collected included Covid-19 statistics of tests, confirmed cases, and deaths in UK. The data analysis techniques applied comparative analysis, descriptive statistics and spatial autocorrelation using Moran’s I index (Local Indicators of Spatial Association). The findings of the study indicated that that England has the highest rates of confirmed Covid-19 case, deaths and conducted tests while Northern Ireland has the lowest rates of confirmed Covid-19 case, deaths and conducted tests. There were no correlation or relationship between the regions under study, in terms of Covid-19 reported cases, tests or deaths. For both year 2020 and 2021, the Covid-19 confirmed cases, tests and deaths among the four neighboring regions were significantly different from each other. The research recommends that each nation should bear its responsibility of adopting and implementing measures geared towards addressing and controlling the spread of Covid-19 pandemic. As well, individuals should take personal preventive measures to avoid being infected with Covid-19 virus, especially in the high risky areas.

Keywords

north koreajoin exercisesideologykonstruktivisme

References

  1. Coccia, M. 2020. The effects of the first and second wave of COVID-19 pandemic on public health.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Castro, M. C., Kim, S., Barberia, L., Ribeiro, A. F., Gurzenda, S., Ribeiro, K. B., & Singer, B. H. 2021. Spatiotemporal pattern of COVID-19 spread in Brazil. Science.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. 1981. Spatial processes: models & applications. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Andrew, C., & Ord, J. K. 1973. Spatial Autocorrelation. Pion, London.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Daw, M. A., El-Bouzedi, A. H., & Ahmed, M. O. 2020. The epidemiological and spatio-temporal characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in Libya.Google Scholar ↗
  6. https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-67010/v1Google Scholar ↗
  7. Goyal, N., Chaturvedi, J., & Arora, R. K. 2021. Letter to the Editor regarding “Neurosurgical referral patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic: a United Kingdom experience”.Google Scholar ↗
  8. World Neurosurgery, 145, 555.Google Scholar ↗
  9. Farrington, C. P., Andrews, N. J., Beale, A. D., & Catchpole, M. A. 1996. A statistical algorithm for the early detection of outbreaks of infectious disease. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 159(3), 547-563.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Giuliani, D., Dickson, M. M., Espa, G., & Santi, F. 2020. Modelling and predicting the spatio- temporal spread of COVID-19 in Italy. BMC infectious diseases, 20(1), 1-10.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Hébert-Dufresne, L., Althouse, B. M., Scarpino, S. V., & Allard, A. 2020. Beyond R 0: heterogeneity in secondary infections and probabilistic epidemic forecasting. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 17(172), 20200393.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Johnson, B. 2020a. PM address to the nation on coronavirus, 23 March https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/pm-address-to-the-nation-on- coronavirus-23-march-2020. Accessed 7 April 2020.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Levers, M. J. D. 2013. Philosophical paradigms, grounded theory, and perspectives on emergence. Sage Open, 3(4), 2158244013517243.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Li, J., Huang, D. Q., Zou, B., Yang, H., Hui, W. Z., Rui, F., & Nguyen, M. H. 2021. Epidemiology of COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes. Journal of medical virology, 93(3), 1449-1458.Google Scholar ↗
  15. Moss, D. 2021. Managing through the Covid second wave: Public affairs and the challenge of Covid vaccination.Google Scholar ↗
  16. McMurray, A. J., Pace, R. W., & Scott, D. 2004. Research: A commonsense approach. Victoria, Australia: Thomson Social Science Press.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Nicastri, E., Petrosillo, N., Ascoli Bartoli, T., Lepore, L., Mondi, A., Palmieri, F., ... & Ippolito, G. 2020. National institute for the infectious diseases “L. Spallanzani” IRCCS. Recommendations for COVID-19 clinical management. Infectious disease reports, 12(1), 3-9.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Richardson, S., Hirsch, J. S., Narasimhan, M., Crawford, J. M., McGinn, T., Davidson, K. W., ... & Zanos, T. P. 2020. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area. Jama, 323(20), 2052-2059.Google Scholar ↗
  19. World Health Organization 2021. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Retrieved from https://covid19.who.int/Google Scholar ↗
  20. Steel, K., & Donnarumma, H. 2021. Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey, UK: 26 February 2021. Office for National Statistics, 26.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Sartorius, B., Lawson, A. B., & Pullan, R. L. 2021. Modelling and predicting the spatio-temporal spread of COVID-19, associated deaths and impact of key risk factors in England. Scientific reports, 11(1), 1-11.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Tavakol, M. & Sanders, J. 2014. Quantitative and qualitative methods in medical education research: AMEE guide no.90: Part 1. Medical Teacher, 36, 746-756Google Scholar ↗
  23. Sky News. (2020). UK needs to get COVID-19 for 'herd immunity', Sky News, 13 March https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2XRc389TvG8&feature=youtu.be. Accessed 7 April 2020.Google Scholar ↗
  24. Moran, Patrick A. P. 1948. “The Interpretation of Statistical Maps.” Biometrika 35: 255–60.Google Scholar ↗
  25. Anselin, Luc. (1996). “The Moran Scatterplot as an ESDA Tool to Assess Local Instability in Spatial Association.” In Spatial Analytical Perspectives on Gis in Environmental and Socio-Economic Sciences, edited by Manfred Fischer, Henk Scholten, and David Unwin, 111–25. London: Taylor; Francis.Google Scholar ↗
  26. Rotejanaprasert C, Lawpoolsri S, Pan-ngum W, Maude RJ 2020 Preliminary estimation of temporal and spatiotemporal dynamic measures of COVID-19 transmission in Thailand. PLoS ONE 15(9): e0239645. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239645DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
  27. Mo, C., Tan, D., Mai, T., Bei, C., Qin, J., Pang, W., & Zhang, Z. 2020. An analysis of spatiotemporal pattern for COIVD‐19 in China based on space‐time cube. Journal of medical virology, 92(9), 1587-1595.Google Scholar ↗
  28. Wu, Z., & McGoogan, J. M. 2020. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Jama, 323(13), 1239-1242.Google Scholar ↗
  29. Riley, S., Fraser, C., Donnelly, C. A., Ghani, A. C., Abu-Raddad, L. J., Hedley, A. J., ... & Anderson, R. M. 2003. Transmission dynamics of the etiological agent of SARS in Hong Kong: impact of public health interventions. Science, 300(5627), 1961-1966.Google Scholar ↗
  30. Imai, N., Cori, A., Dorigatti, I., Baguelin, M., Donnelly, C. A., Riley, S., & Ferguson, N. M. 2020. Report 3: transmissibility of 2019-nCoV. Imperial College London, 1-6.Google Scholar ↗
  31. Bhaskaran, K., Douglas, I., Forbes, H., dos-Santos-Silva, I., Leon, D. A., & Smeeth, L. 2014. Body-mass index and risk of 22 specific cancers: a population-based cohort study of 5· 24 million UK adults. The Lancet, 384(9945), 755-765.Google Scholar ↗
  32. Diabetes UK. Diabetes Facts and Stats: 2015[Online]. United Kingdom, 2015. [cited 29 April 2020] Accessed from Diabetes Facts and Stats: 2015.Google Scholar ↗
  33. NHS Digital. (2017). Health survey for England 2017. NHS Digital. https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/health-survey-for-england/2017Google Scholar ↗
  34. Worldometer. U.K. population (LIVE) [Internet]. 2020; [Updated daily]. Available fromhttps://www.worldometers.info/world-population/uk-population/Google Scholar ↗
  35. Office for National Statistics. Overview of the UK population: August 2019. United Kingdom, 2019. [Last updated 23 August 2019]. Available fromhttps://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/po pulationestimates/articles/overviewoftheukpopulation/august2019.Google Scholar ↗
  36. Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (2020). CMP reports. Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre. https://www.icnarc.org/Our-Audit/Audits/Cmp/ReportsGoogle Scholar ↗
  37. World Health Organisation. Information note on COVID-19 and non-communicable diseases. 2020. Available from https://www.who.int/internal-publications-detail/covid-19-and-ncdsGoogle Scholar ↗
  38. Flynn, D., Moloney, E., Bhattarai, N., Scott, J., Breckons, M., Avery, L., & Moy, N. 2020. COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 673- 691.Google Scholar ↗
  39. World Health Organization (WHO) (2021). The United Kingdom Situation. https://covid19.who.int/region/euro/country/gbGoogle Scholar ↗
Author details
Samuel Wandeto Mathagu
Kirinyaga University
✉ Corresponding Author
ORCID ↗
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication