Abstract
This research aims to explore the meaning of religiosity and cultural compliance of Bhupa' Bhabbhu' Ghuru Rato in Madurese society. This culture is the values, guidelines, norms of life that are believed by the community for generations. In the context of communication studies, tradition and culture become an interesting research phenomenon. Islam and culture are inseparable. This research uses the ethnographic method of communication in the community of Brambang Hamlet, Sumenep, which has a tradition of Islamic boarding school (Pondok Pesantren). This research reveals that the meaning of the value of religiosity and Bhuppa'-Bhabbhu'-Ghuru-Rato obedience of each individual community varies based on their respective experiences and perspectives obtained from the symbolic interaction process. Nevertheless, all informants in this study agreed that the mondok tradition is important to be preserved in order to teach and develop the values of religiosity and obedience.
Keywords
Covid-19Cross Border AgreementPolitical Policies
References
- Achmad, Z. A. (2019). Integration of da'wah and cultural programs: Virtual ethnographic study of mediamorphosis of Nada FM radio Sumenep Madura. Journal of Islamic Communication, 9(2), 238-263.Google Scholar ↗
- Amalia, L., & Hayat, H. (2019). Strengthening the capacity of andeb ashor culture and patronization of Madurese society. Journal of Social and Political Science Innovation, 1(1), 38-42.Google Scholar ↗
- Adli F. N., & Anshori, M, S (2021). The Jakmania Petukangan's symbolic interaction in interpreting its presence in the community. Tambora Journal, 5(3), 8-14.Google Scholar ↗
- Ardianto, E. (2007). Mass communication an introduction. Bandung: Refika Offset.Google Scholar ↗
- Aw, S. (2010). Socio-cultural communication. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.Google Scholar ↗
- Bahesa, S. P., & Nurudin. (2021). Ethnography of taneyan community communication as Pamekasan's cultural identity. Journal of Research and Development of Science and Humanities, 5(3), 478-480.Google Scholar ↗
- Berger, C. R., Roloff, M. E., & Ewoldsen-Roskos, D. R. (2014). Handbook of communication science. Bandung: Communication Sciences.Google Scholar ↗
- Castels, M. (2010). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar ↗
- Dzulkarnain, I., Soetarto, E., Kinseng, R. A., & Sjaf, S. (2020). Nyadar: Religious and cultural resistance of Maduranese salt farming community. Sodality: Journal of Rural Sociology, 8(2), 174-190.Google Scholar ↗
- Effendy, M. H. (2021). Theory & methods of Madurese ethnic cultural studies. Surabaya: CV. Jakad Media Publishing.Google Scholar ↗
- Fitraza, V. (2008). Symbolic interaction theory. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.Google Scholar ↗
- Fitriati, S. A. (2020). Bhuppa' bhabbhu' ghuru rato in the cultural character of Madurese society. (SKRIPSI, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, 2020). accessed from http://digilib.uinsa.ac.id/44436/11/Aida%20Sofia%20Fitriati_A02216004.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
- Haliemah, N. (2016). Community symbolic interaction in interpreting jathilan art. Yogyakarta: State Islamic University of Yogyakarta.Google Scholar ↗
- Haris, A., & Amalia, A. (2018). Meaning and symbols in the process of social interaction (A communication review). TREATISE, 29(1), 16-19.Google Scholar ↗
- Hefni, M. (2007). Bhuppa'-Bhabbhu'-Ghuru-Rato (A constructivist-structuralist study of the hierarchy of obedience in Madurese culture. KARSA, 11(1), 12-20.Google Scholar ↗
- Kholis, M. A., & Kurnia, W. (2021). The god flute as a symbolic identity of the Sasak Kuto-Kute community in Karang Bajo Bayan North Lombok. Journal of Art Studies, 8(1), 15-35.Google Scholar ↗
- Kriyantono, R. (2024). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Edisi 2. Jakarta: Prenada.Google Scholar ↗
- Kriyantono, R. (2019). Pengantar lengkap ilmu komunikasi: Filsafat dan etika ilmunya serta perspektif Islam. Jakarta: Prenada.Google Scholar ↗
- Kriyantono, R., & McKenna, B. (2017). Developing a culturally-relevant public relations theory for Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 33(1), https://ejournal.ukm.my/mjc/article/view/17165Google Scholar ↗
- Kriyantono, R. (2015). Public relations, crisis & issue management. Jakarta: Prenada.Google Scholar ↗
- Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Theorities of human communication (10thth ed.). USA: Waveland Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Marsh, D & Stoker, G. (2021). Qualitative methods and quantitative methods: Political science theory and methods series. Jakarta: Nusamedia.Google Scholar ↗
- Mufida, S. P. (2020). "Barocatology" as the philosophical foundation of pesantren instructional communication (An explorative study with a non-western perspective on education at Pondok Pesantren Modern Darussalam Gontor). (SKRIPSI, Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 2020). accessed from http://repository.ub.ac.id/ id/eprint/180701/Google Scholar ↗
- Mulyana, D. (2012). Cultures and communication Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.Google Scholar ↗
- Mulyana, D. (2016). Communication science an introduction.Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.Google Scholar ↗
- Wahyuni, D. (2018). Jakatarub and religious harmony in Bandung City. Temali: Journal of National Development, 1(2), 259-289.Google Scholar ↗
- West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2008). Introduction to communication theory analysis and applications: 3rd edition: Salemba Humanika.Google Scholar ↗
- Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2006). Mass media research: An introduction (8thth ed.). California: Thompson Wadsworth.Google Scholar ↗
- Yohana, A., & Saifulloh, M. (2019). Symbolic interaction in building communication between superiors and subordinates in the company. DISCOURSE, 18(1), 122-130.Google Scholar ↗