Abstract
The paper embarked on a scholarly exploration, seeking to unravel the intricate dimensions of nationalism and enhance our collective understanding. Through qualitative methodology—specifically contextual analysis—the study vividly examined the interpretations of influential thinkers regarding this complex concept. Topics spanned from “Nationalism and Its Relationship to a Nation” to “Theoretical Perspectives on Nationalism” and “Filipino Nationalism: Historical Context, Critical Issues, and Developments.” The analysis revealed that nationalism, as a subject, underwent extensive scholarly debate and analysis, reflecting its multifaceted nature and profound impact on nation-building and identity formation. In retrospect, the discourse surrounding nationalism encompassed diverse perspectives, ranging from its role in political and social transformation to its enduring influence on human history
Keywords
References
- Abrera, M. B. L., & Torres, W. M. (2016). Review of Rido: Clan Feuding and Conflict Management in Mindanao (Expanded ed.). Philippine Studies: Historical & Ethnographic Viewpoints, 64(2), 329–332. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26621972Google Scholar ↗
- Agoncillo, T. A. & Guerrero, M. C. (2002). The History of Filipino People (8th ed). R.P. Garcia Publishing Co. Quezon City, Philippines.Google Scholar ↗
- Akmad, S., Akmad, A., (2024). From Stereotypes to Sentiments: A Qualitative Study on Millennial Attitudes towards Muslims and their Root Causes. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(7), 939-944. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11583050DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Anderson, B. R. O. 1. (2006). Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Rev. ed. London; New York, Verso.Google Scholar ↗
- Bonikowski, B. (2016). Nationalism in settled times. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(0), 427-449. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074412DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Bonikowski, B., & DiMaggio, P. (2016). Varieties of American popular nationalism. American Sociological Review, 81(5), 949–980.Google Scholar ↗
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122416663683DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Cohler, A. M. (1970). Rousseau and nationalism. Basic Books. 212-215. https://archive.org/details/rousseaunational0000cohl/page/n7/mode/1upGoogle Scholar ↗
- Gellner, E. (1998). The State of the Nation: Theory of Nationalism. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar ↗
- Ileto, R. (1985). Critical Questions on Nationalism: A Historian View. Diamond Jubilee Publication, De La Salle University.Google Scholar ↗
- Kundra, N. (2019). Understanding nation and nationalism. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 21(2), 125–145.Google Scholar ↗
- https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.21.2.0125DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Meadows, M. (1970). Colonialism, social structure, and nationalism: The Philippine case. Pacific Affairs, 43(3), 394–413. https://doi.org/10.2307/2755708DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Orwell, G. (2018). Notes on Nationalism. Penguin Classics. Penguin Classics Publishing. London, England.Google Scholar ↗
- Pianko, N. (2010). Did Kohn Believe in the “Kohn Dichotomy”? Reconsidering Kohn’s Journey from The Political Idea of Judaism to the Idea of Nationalism. The Leo Baeck Institute Year Book, 55(1), 295–311. DOI: 10.1093/lbyb/ybq039DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Quibuyen, F. (2002). Rizal and Filipino nationalism: Critical issues. Philippine Studies, 50(2), 193–229.Google Scholar ↗
- https://doi.org/10.1353/phs.2002.0010DOI ↗Google Scholar ↗
- Smith, A. (1995). Nationalism. Oxford University Press, United States of America.Google Scholar ↗
- Zaide, Gregorio F. (1984). José Rizal: life, works, and writings of a genius, writer, scientist, and national hero. Metro Manila, Philippines:National Book StoreGoogle Scholar ↗
- Zaide, S. M. (2013). The Philippines: A Unique Nation (2nd ed). All-Nations Publishing Co., Inc., Quezon City.Google Scholar ↗