ISSN 2456-2653
server-injected
ArticlesOpen Access

Discourse of The Presidential Debate of The Republic of Indonesia in The 2024 Elections (Analysis of Presidential Candidates' Discourse in The First, Third, and Fifth Debates)

DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v8i07.1231· Pages: 4490-4497· Vol. 8, No. 07, (2024)· Published: July 26, 2024
PDF
Views: 204 PDF downloads: 219

Abstract

This study analyzes presidential candidate debates using Halliday's discourse analysis approach, focusing on three main aspects: field of discourse, actor of discourse, and mode of discourse. The primary aim of this research is to explore how the discourse presented by candidates in the first, third, and fifth debates reflects the visions and missions they promote. Through qualitative analysis, this research finds that each debate has unique characteristics in message delivery. In the first debate, candidates emphasize the introduction of their visions and missions, while in the third debate, there is a more intense dynamic of interaction focusing on argumentation. The fifth debate showcases a more emotional and persuasive mode of discourse, highlighting the connection between the messages and the aspirations of the audience. The findings indicate that the discourse conveyed by presidential candidates is consistently aligned with the visions and missions they advocate, suggesting that the communication strategies employed play a crucial role in shaping their image and garnering support. This study aims to provide new insights into political communication research and serves as a reference for future studies in the context of political debates in Indonesia.

Keywords

Company ValueCapital StructureCompany GrowthLiquidityProfitability

References

  1. BBC News Indonesia. (2024, Januari 28). Debat cawapres 2024: Adu gagasan soal ekonomi, perdagangan, infrastruktur dan IKN Nusantara – Apa janji Gibran, Muhaimin, dan Mahfud, dan apa saja yang luput dalam debat?. Retrieved fromGoogle Scholar ↗
  2. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/cw0dnxn436woGoogle Scholar ↗
  3. BBC News Indonesia (2024, May 14). Rangkuman debat capres: Anies-Prabowo saling serang soal etika hingga pengetahuan soal pertahanan, tiga capres angkat isu Palestina. Retrieved fromGoogle Scholar ↗
  4. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/articles/c51z5g1kv61oGoogle Scholar ↗
  5. Cangara, H. (2016). Komunikasi Politik:Konsep, Teori, dan Strategi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo PersadaGoogle Scholar ↗
  6. CNN Indonesia. (2023, Maret 23). Dugaan Pelanggaran Etik Ketua MK Anwar Usman Dinilai Bisa Pengaruhi Pemilu 2024. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230827173041-12-991120/denny-indrayana-akan-laporkan-anwar-usman-atas-dugaan-pelanggaran-etikGoogle Scholar ↗
  7. Gross & D'Ambrosio. (2004). Communication technology and social change: Theory and implications. Routledge.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Irmayanti, (2023). Debat Capres Pertama: Saling Serang Tak Terelakkan. Di akses pada (2024, April 5). Retrieved from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7086532/debat-capres-pertama-saling-serang-tak-terelakkanGoogle Scholar ↗
  9. Ibrahim, A. (2024, Februari 25). Anies Baswedan dominasi perbincangan di medsos saat debat Capres, Prabowo dan Ganjar mengikuti. https://www.kompas.com/tag/debat-capres-2024Google Scholar ↗
  10. Kaid. (2015). Handbook Penelitian Komunikasi Politik. Bandung: Nusa Media.Google Scholar ↗
  11. KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum). (2023). Hasyim jelaskan beda situasi pemilu 2024 dengan 2019. Kpu.go.id [website]. Retrieved from https://www.kpu.go.id/berita/baca/11972/hasyim-jelaskan-beda-situasi-pemilu-2024-dengan-pemilu-2019Google Scholar ↗
  12. KPU (Komisi Pemilihan Umum). (2023, 13 Nov). KPU tetapkan tiga pasangan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Pemilu 2024. Retrieved fromGoogle Scholar ↗
  13. https://www.kpu.go.id/berita/baca/12081/kpu-tetapkan-tiga-pasangan-calon-presiden-dan-wakil-presiden-pemilu-2024.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Kathleen Hall Jamieson dan Doron Taussig, The Obama victory: How media, money, and message shaped the 2008 Election. (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar ↗
  15. Littlejohn, & Foss. (2009). Teori komunikasi. Jakarta: Salemba HumanikaGoogle Scholar ↗
  16. Liaw, K. L. (2022). The Politically Charged Message in the Indonesian Debate. Journal of Political Communication, 1(1), 1-15.Google Scholar ↗
  17. McBath, L. (1969). Persuasion in Political Discourse. Journal of Political Communication, 12(3), 45-60.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Nimmo, D. (2005). Komunikasi Politik: Komunikator, Pesan, dan Media. Bandung:Remadja Karya Cipta.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Putra, Agil Tri Setiawan. (2023, November 5). MKMK Segera putuskan dugaan pelanggaran etik hakim MK, Gibran: Tunggu saja. Retrieved from https://www.detik.com/jateng/berita/d-7019830/mkmk-segera-putuskan-dugaan-pelanggaran-etik-hakim-mk-gibran-tunggu-saja.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Santoso, A. (2008). Jejak Halliday dalam linguistik kritis dan analisis wacana kritis. Jurnal Bahasa dan Seni, 36(1), 1-14.Google Scholar ↗
  21. Satriawan, A. (2023). The Perspective of Generation Z on Presidential Candidates with Attractive Images. Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 1-15.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Sobur, A. (2018). Analsis teks media. Bandung: Remaja RosdakaryaGoogle Scholar ↗
Author details
Nur Istianah
Communication studies, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Brawijaya University, Indonesia
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication