ISSN 2456-2653
Contact us
Social Science and Humanities Journal
ISSN 2456-2653
Submit Paper
server-injected
ArticlesOpen Access

The Relationship Between Citizen Perceptions on Government Transparency and Economic Development: A Case of Thika Town Sub-County, in Kiambu County, Kenya

,
DOI: 10.18535/sshj.v8i07.1198· Pages: 4250-4269· Vol. 8, No. 07, (2024)· Published: July 9, 2024
PDF
Views: 217 PDF downloads: 194

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between citizens' perception of government transparency and economic development in Thika Town Sub-County, Kiambu County, Kenya. The data collected on the first objective are explained in this section. Financial constraints were found to hinder citizens' ability and willingness to access resource allocation information, limiting their capacity to travel to county offices, access the internet, or purchase materials containing the relevant information. Despite this, respondents agreed to a great extent that the county government is transparent about how funds are spent in different sectors (mean = 3.7597, std. deviation = 0.69095), that the process for county resource allocation is clearly communicated to citizens (mean = 3.5581, std. deviation = 0.83128), and that information about how resources are allocated is easily accessible to the public (mean = 3.5116, std. deviation = 0.91101). The study’s third objective was to assess whether openness and transparency of the county's contracting and procurement practices influence economic development in Thika Town Sub-County in Kiambu County, Kenya. The findings were as follows. Concerning openness and transparency of county contracting and procurement practices, 63% of respondents indicated that information about county contracts and procurements is private, while 22% said it is available, and 15% were unsure. The majority of respondents (61%) indicated that the county's contracting and procurement processes are somewhat transparent, while 24% said they are very transparent, and 15% said they are not transparent at all. Even when information on county contracts and procurements is available, it may not be easily accessible due to bureaucratic hurdles, outdated or incomplete online resources, and the need for personal visits to county offices. Despite these challenges, respondents greatly agreed that the procurement and tendering process is open and transparent (mean = 3.7907, std. deviation = 0.78735), that increased transparency in contracting/procurement has benefited local businesses (mean = 3.7054, std. deviation = 0.80314), and that award criteria and selection methods are clearly defined and available (mean = 3.6419, std. deviation = 0.93763). The study concludes that while efforts exist to promote transparency in resource allocation, there are still gaps in the adequacy and accessibility of information. Financial constraints can be a barrier to citizens' engagement with government processes and access to information, potentially hindering their ability to hold the government accountable and contribute to economic development. The study concludes that addressing financial barriers and improving the accessibility and comprehensibility of resource allocation information could enhance citizens' participation and, consequently, economic development. The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, civil society organizations, and citizens in Thika Town Sub-County and beyond, highlighting the need for a comprehensive and balanced approach to transparency reforms that prioritizes both information disclosure and citizen empowerment. The study concludes that by addressing the identified challenges and strengthening transparency and participation mechanisms, local governments can create a more conducive environment for sustainable economic growth and improve the lives of their citizens.

Keywords

Collaborative technologiesScientific productionAcademic search enginesWord processors

References

  1. Androniceanu, A. (2021). Transparency in public administration as a challenge for good democratic governance. Revista» Administratie si Management Public «(RAMP), (36), 149-164.Google Scholar ↗
  2. Alt, J., Lassen, D. D., & Wehner, J. (2014). It isn't just about Greece: domestic politics, transparency, and fiscal gimmickry in Europe. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 707-716.Google Scholar ↗
  3. Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30.Google Scholar ↗
  4. Brusca, I., Manes Rossi, F., & Aversano, N. (2018). Accountability and transparency to fight against corruption: an international comparative analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 20(5), 486-504.Google Scholar ↗
  5. Buell, R. W., Porter, E., & Norton, M. I. (2021). Surfacing the submerged state: Operational transparency increases trust in and engagement with government. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(4), 781-802.Google Scholar ↗
  6. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar ↗
  7. Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2019). Citizen participation, process, and transparency in local government: An exploratory study. Policy Studies Journal, 47(4), 1026-1047.Google Scholar ↗
  8. Kithinji, C. N. (2011). Challenges facing the implementation of Kenya Vision 2030 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).Google Scholar ↗
  9. Khagram, S., Fung, A., & De Renzio, P. (2013). Open budgets: The political economy of transparency, participation, and accountability. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar ↗
  10. Hirose, M., & Creswell, J. W. (2023). Applying core quality criteria of mixed methods research to an empirical study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(1), 12-28.Google Scholar ↗
  11. Meijer, A., ’t Hart, P., & Worthy, B. (2018). Assessing government transparency: An interpretive framework. Administration & Society, 50(4), 501-526.Google Scholar ↗
  12. Michener, G., Coelho, J., & Moreira, D. (2021). Are governments complying with transparency? Findings from 15 years of evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2), 101565.Google Scholar ↗
  13. Miller, L. C., Shaikh, S. J., Jeong, D. C., Wang, L., Gillig, T. K., Godoy, C. G., ... & Read, S. J. (2019). Causal inference in generalizable environments: systematic representative design. Psychological Inquiry, 30(4), 173-202.Google Scholar ↗
  14. Munyao, F. M. (2019). The Influence of Public Participation on Public Accountability in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).Google Scholar ↗
  15. Prabhu, S. M., Murthy, K. B., & Natarajan, S. (2019). Balanced growth using ontology-based tantra framework. Journal of Information and Knowledge, 171-187.Google Scholar ↗
  16. Tavares, A. F., & da Cruz, N. F. (2020). Explaining the transparency of local government websites through a political market framework. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101249.Google Scholar ↗
  17. Taherdoost, H. (2019). What is the best response scale for survey and questionnaire design; review of different lengths of rating scale/attitude scale/Likert scale. Hamed Taherdoost, 1-10.Google Scholar ↗
  18. Taherdoost, H. (2022). Designing a Questionnaire for a Research Paper: A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Develop an Effective Questionnaire. Asian Journal of Managerial Science, 11, 8-16.Google Scholar ↗
  19. Vebrianto, R., Thahir, M., Putriani, Z., Mahartika, I., & Ilhami, A. (2020). Mixed Methods Research: Trends and Issues in Research Methodology. Bedelau: Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 63-73.Google Scholar ↗
  20. Wanjiku, K. (2019). Influence of Community Participation on Completion of Constituency Development Fund Projects in Kenya: A Case of Kabete Constituency, Thika Town Sub-County (Doctoral dissertation, University of Nairobi).Google Scholar ↗
  21. Weiner, B. (2014). Searching for the roots of applied attribution theory. In Attribution Theory (pp. 1-13). Psychology Press.Google Scholar ↗
  22. Weiner, B. (1972). Attribution theory, achievement motivation, and the educational process. Review of Educational Research, 42(2), 203-215.Google Scholar ↗
Author details
Hanna Njeri Wainaina
Institute of Security Studies, Justice and Ethics, Mount Kenya University
✉ Corresponding Author
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication
Dr Solomon Muhindi
Institute of Security Studies, Justice and Ethics, Mount Kenya University
👤 View Profile →🔗 Is this you? Claim this publication