Abstract
While the Mau Forest Complex is considered a critical water tower area in Kenya, the ecosystem is under increasing threat from irregular and poorly planned settlements, encroachments and illegal logging. Maasai Mau Forest which is part of the larger Mau Forest complex is experiencing pressure of unprecedented levels. As such, this study presents a comprehensive historical examination of the intricate interplay between the Maasai communities, national politics and timber extraction in the Mau complex in Kenya. Drawing upon a case study analysis of the Maasai section of the Mau Forest, this study delves into the dynamics shaping the relationship between indigenous peoples and the timber industry. Through a combination of qualitative interviews, document analysis, and ethnographic fieldwork, the research explores the complex socio-political, economic, and environmental factors influencing indigenous perspectives on timber extraction. Key issues identified here are for example nature of land rights and ownership, the impact of resource exploitation on indigenous livelihoods and cultural heritage, power asymmetries in decision-making processes, the role of legal frameworks and regulations in shaping indigenous rights, and the significance of community empowerment and advocacy in resisting unsustainable practices. Additionally, the study examines the influence of corporate interests, government policies, and international interventions on Maasai experiences with timber extraction. Findings reveal diverse Maasai responses to timber extraction politics, ranging from resistance and activism to negotiation and collaboration with external stakeholders. Moreover, the study underscores the importance of recognizing indigenous knowledge systems, cultural values, and land stewardship practices in promoting sustainable forest management and fostering equitable relationships between indigenous communities and the timber industry.
Keywords
References
- Baldyga, T. J. et al. (2007). “Assessing Land Cover Change in Kenya’s Mau Forest Region UsingGoogle Scholar ↗
- a. Remotely Sensed Data” African Journal of Ecology 46, 46-54, doi: 10. 1111/j.1365-2028.2007.00806x.Google Scholar ↗
- Beinart,W. and Lotte, H.(2009). Environment and Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Beinart.W.(2000). “African History and Environmental History” African Affairs Vol, 99. No 395,Google Scholar ↗
- a. Centenary Issue; A Hundred Years of Africa (April 2000) pp 269-302.Google Scholar ↗
- Berry,S.(1989). “Social Institutions and Access to Resources in Africa”,59(1):41-55,1989.Google Scholar ↗
- Boone, Catherine.(2012). Land Conflict and Distributive Politics in Kenya. African Studies Review,Google Scholar ↗
- a. April 2012. Vol 55, No 1 (April 2012) pp 75-103: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- KNA/DC/NKU/1/5 Annual Report--Nakuru District 1952.Google Scholar ↗
- Hutchins, D.E. (1909). Report on Forests of British East Africa. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar ↗
- Klopp, J. “Deforestation and Democratization: Patronage, Politics and Forests in Kenya”Google Scholar ↗
- a. Kenya Land Alliuance2011{online}Available at: http//www.kenyaland alliance.or.ke/home/viewed on July 22 2020.Google Scholar ↗
- Klopp,J. M. and Sang, J.K.(2011) . “Maps, Power, and the Destruction of the Mau Forest in Kenya”:Google Scholar ↗
- a. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, winter/ spring.Google Scholar ↗
- KNA/ DC/NKR/1/7 Annual Report-Narok District 1951.Google Scholar ↗
- KNA/K/6349/ECO/1750. An Economic Survey of Forestry in Kenya and RecommendationsGoogle Scholar ↗
- a. Regarding Forest Commission. Nairobi, The English Press 1951.Google Scholar ↗
- KNA/NKU/1/6 Annual Report- Nakuru District.1953.Google Scholar ↗
- Major Oliphant. “The Commercial Possibilities and Development of Forests in British East Africa.Google Scholar ↗
- McCann,J.M.“The Plow and the Forest: Narratives of Deforestation in Ethiopia, 1840-Google Scholar ↗
- a. 1992”.Environmental History Volume 2, Issue2 April 1997, 138-159https://www.wwfkenya.org/-our-work-forest. Retrieved 20/05/2022.Google Scholar ↗
- Ofcansky, T. (1984) “Kenya Forestry under British Colonial Administration, 1895-1963”, Journal of Forest History, July.Google Scholar ↗
- Pearl of Portsmouth. (1937). “The Future of Forest Policy for Kenya Report”. Africa”. ColonialGoogle Scholar ↗
- a. Forest Resources Development Department Colonial Office, 1937.Google Scholar ↗
- Siringi, E.M. (2008). Forest Conflict Amidst National Controversy in Kenya: Lessons of theGoogle Scholar ↗
- a. Mau Forest Complex. Environment and Natural Resource Journal 8(1), pp 43.5.4.Google Scholar ↗
- Southall. Roger.(2005). “Ndungú Report Summary” Review of African Political Economy, 103Google Scholar ↗
- a. (March) pp.142-151.Google Scholar ↗
- Talbot, L.H. and M.H. Talbot, M.H. (1960). “Land use Survey of Narok District. DistrictGoogle Scholar ↗
- a. Commissioners Office. Narok.Google Scholar ↗
- Trapnell, C.G. and Langdale,I.(1962). “A Sketch of East African Vegetation (Eight BritishGoogle Scholar ↗
- a. Commonwealth Forestry Conference”, East Africa.Google Scholar ↗
- Willis, T.G et al. (1969). Report of the Agricultural Feasibility Study Team. Narok District, Kenya,Google Scholar ↗
- a. Report to Government of Canada.Google Scholar ↗