Abstract
This research investigates unconventional approaches to morality within an existentialist framework, focusing on pivotal thinkers such as Arthur Schopenhauer and Friedrich Nietzsche. Existentialism emerged as a response to the erosion of traditional religious and metaphysical frameworks in modernity, prompting existentialists to confront fundamental questions about the foundations of morality in a world devoid of transcendent norms. The study explores how existentialist thinkers conceptualize morality in the absence of traditional religious or metaphysical frameworks, critically examining their critiques of conventional ethical norms and proposing alternative visions of ethical living. Through a qualitative approach involving textual analysis of primary philosophical texts by Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, this research aims to elucidate existentialist perspectives on morality. Schopenhauer's philosophy emphasizes the concept of 'will' as the primary driving force behind human actions, challenging prevailing rationalistic explanations. He presents a pessimistic outlook on life, advocating for compassion and altruism as paths towards transcendence. In contrast, Nietzsche critiques foundational moral concepts, particularly Christian doctrines, asserting that moral judgments are shaped by societal power dynamics rather than objective truths. This study's significance lies in enriching ethical theory and inspiring critical reflection on the foundations of morality in a secular and uncertain world. By examining existentialist critiques of conventional morality and exploring alternative ethical frameworks grounded in existential principles, this research aims to stimulate dialogue on existentialist ethics and its relevance for addressing pressing ethical challenges in diverse cultural and social contexts. Ultimately, this investigation seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of ethics and morality within the complex tapestry of human existence.
Keywords
References
- Berkowitz, P. (1995). Nietzsche: The Ethics of an Immoralist. UK: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Boone, R. (2000). Ethics. USA: Adams MediaGoogle Scholar ↗
- Jacquette, D. (2005). The Philosophy of Schopenhauer. UK: McGill-Queen’s University PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Janaway, O. (2002). Schopenhauer – A Very Short Introduction. USA: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Leiter, B. (2002). Nietzsche On Morality. USA: Routledge PublicationsGoogle Scholar ↗
- Lewis, P, B. (0000). Arthus Schopenhauer. UK: Reaktion BooksGoogle Scholar ↗
- Owen, D. (2007). Nietzsche’s Genealogy of Morality. UK: Acumen Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar ↗
- Pearson, K, A. (2007). Friedrich Nietzsche – On the Genealogy of Morality. USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar ↗
- Solomon, R, & Higgins, K, M. (2000). What Nietzsche Really Said. USA: Schocken Books PublishersGoogle Scholar ↗
- Vandenabeele, B. (2012). A Companion to Schopenhauer. USA: Wiley Blackwell PublicationsGoogle Scholar ↗
- Warnock, M. (1967). Existentialist Ethics. USA: Macmillan and Company LimitedGoogle Scholar ↗
- Welshon, R. (2001). The Philosophy of Nietzsche. UK: McGill-Queen’s University PressGoogle Scholar ↗
- Young, J. (2005). Schopenhauer. USA: Routledge PublicationsGoogle Scholar ↗
