Implementing the Input Hypothesis in Designing Balinese Language Learning Intake  for First-Grade Elementary School Students

Nengah Arnawa; I Ketut Suar Adnyana; Ketut Yarsama; I Nyoman Rajeg Mulyawan

doi:10.18535/sshj.v8i04.1011

Abstract

The input hypothesis is a fundamental concept in language learning, stating that the teaching materials used must be above students’ current linguistic competence during the learning process. This shows the importance of comprehending the Balinese language competence of first-grade elementary school students as a reference for learning. Therefore, this study aimed to map out the competence of first-grade elementary school students as a reference for selecting and grading Balinese language learning intake at the higher grades and educational levels. The study procedures were carried out by collecting data in a semi-naturalistic setting over 2 months from first-grade students at Elementary School 3 Paksebali, Klungkung, and Elementary School 1 Alasangker, Buleleng. The data obtained were then analyzed using descriptive-qualitative analysis. The results showed Balinese language repertoire of first-grade students had idiosyncrasies as distinguishing features. These idiosyncrasies were found in phonological, lexical/semantic, morphological, and syntactic aspects as references. Based on the results obtained, language learning with the input hypothesis could be applied critically and consistently.

Keywords

The Input HypothesisIntakeLinguisticCompetenceIdiosyncrasies of Students’ Balinese Language

References

Ainin, M. (2021). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berbasis Hipotesis Input dan Pemerolehan (Kontribusi Pedagogik untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbahasa Arab). Konasbara Vol. 7, 484–494 https://prosiding.arab-um.com/index.php/konasbara/article/view/1003/944Google Scholar ↗
Alwi, H. (1998). Bahasa sebagai Jati Diri Bangsa”. Kongres Bahasa Bali IV, 38 – 54. Denpasar: Balai Penelitian Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.Google Scholar ↗
https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/3062/1/Kongres%20Bahasa%20Bali%20IV.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
Arnawa, N. (2008). Wawasan Linguistik dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Denpasar: Plawa Sari.Google Scholar ↗
Arnawa, N. (2016). Pergeseran Kosakata Ranah Pertanian: Studi Linguistik Kebudayaan. Aksara Vol. 28(1), 103 – 110. https://aksara.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/aksara/article/view/21Google Scholar ↗
Bailey, F. and Fahad, A.K. (2021). Krashen Revisited: Case Study of the Role of Input, Motivation and Identity in Second Language Learning. Arab World English Journal Vol. 12(2), 540 – 550 https://awej.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/36.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
Baradja, M.F. (1990). Kapita Selekta Pengajaran Bahasa. Malang: IKIP Malang Press.Google Scholar ↗
Brown, H.D. (2005). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco: San Francisco State University Press.Google Scholar ↗
Burton-Roberts, N. and Spencer, A. (1993). Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Vivian Cook.Google Scholar ↗
Chaer, A. (2003). Psikolinguistik: Kajian Teoretis. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.Google Scholar ↗
Crider, A. B., et.al. (1983). Psychology. Dallas: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar ↗
Dardjowidjojo, S. (2000). Echa: Kisah Pemerolehan Bahasa Anak Indonesia. Jakarta: Grasindo.Google Scholar ↗
Djajasudarma, T. F. (1993). Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode dan Kajian. Bandung: Eresco.Google Scholar ↗
Darihastining, S; Mardiana, W; Misnawati; Sulistyawati, H; and Sujinh. (2023). Penerapan Berbagai Hipotesis Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua Terhadap Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi, Vol. 7(1), 685 – 698. https://obsesi.or.id/index.php/obsesi/article/view/3893Google Scholar ↗
Hamied, F.A. (1987). Proses Belajar Mengajar Bahasa. Jakarta: Depdikbud.Google Scholar ↗
Kaswanti Purwo, B. (1991). Bulir-Bulir Sastra dan Bahasa: Pembaharuan Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.Google Scholar ↗
Keraf, G. (1990). Linguistik Bandingan Tipologis. Jakarta: Gramedia.Google Scholar ↗
Krashen, S.D. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar ↗
Krashen, S.D. (2009). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. California: University of Southern California Press.Google Scholar ↗
Larsen-Freman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Prss.Google Scholar ↗
Liu, D. (2015). A Critical Review of Krashen’s Input Hypothesis: Three Major Arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development Vol.4(4), 139 – 146Google Scholar ↗
https://jehdnet.com/journals/jehd/Vol_4_No_4_December_2015/16.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
Maharsi, I. (2011). The Importance Input and Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Journal of English and Education Vol. 5(1), 45 – 53 https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEE/article/view/4459/3941Google Scholar ↗
Maksan, M. (1993). Psikolinguistik. Padang: IKIP Padang Press.Google Scholar ↗
Miles, M. and Huberman, A.M. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.Google Scholar ↗
Mustofa, T; Astina, C; and Rahman. R.A. (2021). Hipotesis Monitor Stephen Krashen dan Reorientasi Pembelajaran Istima-Kalam. Tarling: Journal of Language Education, Vol. 5(2), 207 – 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357866531_Hipotesis_Monitor_Stephen_Krashen_dan_Reorientasi_Pembelajaran_Istima-KalamGoogle Scholar ↗
Parnaningroem, D.W. (1990). Peranan Input di Lingkungan Kelas dalam Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua. Dimensi-Dimensi Belajar Bahasa Kedua. Nurhadi dan Roekhan (ed). Bandung: Sinar Baru.Google Scholar ↗
Revopa, K. (2004). Testing Krashen’s Input Hypothesis: Case Study in a Male Czech Adult Acquiring English. Brno: Masaryk University. https://is.muni.cz/th/ur5e5/text.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗
Sauusure, F. de. Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadja Mada University Press.Google Scholar ↗
Schutz, R.E. (2019). Stephen Krashen’s Theoty of Second Language Acquisition. https://www.sk.com.br/sk-krash-english.html.Google Scholar ↗
Simajuntak, M. (1990). Teori-Teori Pemerolehan Fonologi. Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama.Google Scholar ↗
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Google Scholar ↗
Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.Google Scholar ↗
Sugiyono. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.Google Scholar ↗
Sumarsono. (2007). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Sabda.Google Scholar ↗
Sutama, I. M. (1990). Ciri-Ciri Pemerolehan B2 dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Kedua. Dimensi-Dimensi dalam Belajar bahasa Kedua. Nurhadi dan Roekhan (ed). Bandung: Sinar Baru.Google Scholar ↗
Sutrisna, I P.E. (2021). Integrasi Teori Krashen dalam Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Inggris pada Pembelajaran Daring di Perguruan Tinggi. Padma Sari Vol. 1(1), 46 – 55Google Scholar ↗
https://e-journal.iahn-gdepudja.ac.id/index.php/PS/article/view/345/211Google Scholar ↗
Tarigan, H.G. and Tarigan, D. (1988). Pengajaran Analisis Kesalahan. Bandung Angkasa.Google Scholar ↗
Warmadewi, A.A.I.M and Mahayana, I M.A. (2021). Pemerolehan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Kedua Pemandu Wisata Lokal di Desa Bongkasa Pertiwi: Hipoetis Krashen. Lingua Vol. 18(1), 174 – 184. https://lingua.soloclcs.org/index.php/lingua/article/view/692Google Scholar ↗
White, L. (1987). Against Comprehensible Input: The Input Hypithesis and the Development of Second Language Competence. Applied Linguistics Vol. 8(2), 95 – 110Google Scholar ↗
https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/8/2/95/153392?redirectedFrom=fulltextGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-1] Ainin, M. (2021). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berbasis Hipotesis Input dan Pemerolehan (Kontribusi Pedagogik untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbahasa Arab). Konasbara Vol. 7, 484–494 https://prosiding.arab-um.com/index.php/konasbara/article/view/1003/944Google Scholar ↗

[refR-2] Alwi, H. (1998). Bahasa sebagai Jati Diri Bangsa”. Kongres Bahasa Bali IV, 38 – 54. Denpasar: Balai Penelitian Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-3] https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/3062/1/Kongres%20Bahasa%20Bali%20IV.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-4] Arnawa, N. (2008). Wawasan Linguistik dan Pengajaran Bahasa. Denpasar: Plawa Sari.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-5] Arnawa, N. (2016). Pergeseran Kosakata Ranah Pertanian: Studi Linguistik Kebudayaan. Aksara Vol. 28(1), 103 – 110. https://aksara.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/aksara/article/view/21Google Scholar ↗

[refR-6] Bailey, F. and Fahad, A.K. (2021). Krashen Revisited: Case Study of the Role of Input, Motivation and Identity in Second Language Learning. Arab World English Journal Vol. 12(2), 540 – 550 https://awej.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/36.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-7] Baradja, M.F. (1990). Kapita Selekta Pengajaran Bahasa. Malang: IKIP Malang Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-8] Brown, H.D. (2005). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. San Francisco: San Francisco State University Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-9] Burton-Roberts, N. and Spencer, A. (1993). Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Vivian Cook.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-10] Chaer, A. (2003). Psikolinguistik: Kajian Teoretis. Bandung: Rineka Cipta.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-11] Crider, A. B., et.al. (1983). Psychology. Dallas: Scott, Foresman and Company.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-12] Dardjowidjojo, S. (2000). Echa: Kisah Pemerolehan Bahasa Anak Indonesia. Jakarta: Grasindo.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-13] Djajasudarma, T. F. (1993). Metode Linguistik: Ancangan Metode dan Kajian. Bandung: Eresco.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-14] Darihastining, S; Mardiana, W; Misnawati; Sulistyawati, H; and Sujinh. (2023). Penerapan Berbagai Hipotesis Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua Terhadap Anak Usia Dini. Jurnal Obsesi, Vol. 7(1), 685 – 698. https://obsesi.or.id/index.php/obsesi/article/view/3893Google Scholar ↗

[refR-15] Hamied, F.A. (1987). Proses Belajar Mengajar Bahasa. Jakarta: Depdikbud.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-16] Kaswanti Purwo, B. (1991). Bulir-Bulir Sastra dan Bahasa: Pembaharuan Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-17] Keraf, G. (1990). Linguistik Bandingan Tipologis. Jakarta: Gramedia.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-18] Krashen, S.D. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-19] Krashen, S.D. (2009). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. California: University of Southern California Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-20] Larsen-Freman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Prss.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-21] Liu, D. (2015). A Critical Review of Krashen’s Input Hypothesis: Three Major Arguments. Journal of Education and Human Development Vol.4(4), 139 – 146Google Scholar ↗

[refR-22] https://jehdnet.com/journals/jehd/Vol_4_No_4_December_2015/16.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-23] Maharsi, I. (2011). The Importance Input and Interaction in Second Language Acquisition. Journal of English and Education Vol. 5(1), 45 – 53 https://journal.uii.ac.id/JEE/article/view/4459/3941Google Scholar ↗

[refR-24] Maksan, M. (1993). Psikolinguistik. Padang: IKIP Padang Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-25] Miles, M. and Huberman, A.M. (2014). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-26] Mustofa, T; Astina, C; and Rahman. R.A. (2021). Hipotesis Monitor Stephen Krashen dan Reorientasi Pembelajaran Istima-Kalam. Tarling: Journal of Language Education, Vol. 5(2), 207 – 2017. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357866531_Hipotesis_Monitor_Stephen_Krashen_dan_Reorientasi_Pembelajaran_Istima-KalamGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-27] Parnaningroem, D.W. (1990). Peranan Input di Lingkungan Kelas dalam Pemerolehan Bahasa Kedua. Dimensi-Dimensi Belajar Bahasa Kedua. Nurhadi dan Roekhan (ed). Bandung: Sinar Baru.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-28] Revopa, K. (2004). Testing Krashen’s Input Hypothesis: Case Study in a Male Czech Adult Acquiring English. Brno: Masaryk University. https://is.muni.cz/th/ur5e5/text.pdfGoogle Scholar ↗

[refR-29] Sauusure, F. de. Pengantar Linguistik Umum. Yogyakarta: Gadja Mada University Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-30] Schutz, R.E. (2019). Stephen Krashen’s Theoty of Second Language Acquisition. https://www.sk.com.br/sk-krash-english.html.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-31] Simajuntak, M. (1990). Teori-Teori Pemerolehan Fonologi. Jakarta: Gaya Media Pratama.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-32] Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (2003). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-33] Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-34] Sugiyono. (2012). Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-35] Sumarsono. (2007). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Sabda.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-36] Sutama, I. M. (1990). Ciri-Ciri Pemerolehan B2 dan Implikasinya pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Kedua. Dimensi-Dimensi dalam Belajar bahasa Kedua. Nurhadi dan Roekhan (ed). Bandung: Sinar Baru.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-37] Sutrisna, I P.E. (2021). Integrasi Teori Krashen dalam Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Bahasa Inggris pada Pembelajaran Daring di Perguruan Tinggi. Padma Sari Vol. 1(1), 46 – 55Google Scholar ↗

[refR-38] https://e-journal.iahn-gdepudja.ac.id/index.php/PS/article/view/345/211Google Scholar ↗

[refR-39] Tarigan, H.G. and Tarigan, D. (1988). Pengajaran Analisis Kesalahan. Bandung Angkasa.Google Scholar ↗

[refR-40] Warmadewi, A.A.I.M and Mahayana, I M.A. (2021). Pemerolehan dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Kedua Pemandu Wisata Lokal di Desa Bongkasa Pertiwi: Hipoetis Krashen. Lingua Vol. 18(1), 174 – 184. https://lingua.soloclcs.org/index.php/lingua/article/view/692Google Scholar ↗

[refR-41] White, L. (1987). Against Comprehensible Input: The Input Hypithesis and the Development of Second Language Competence. Applied Linguistics Vol. 8(2), 95 – 110Google Scholar ↗

[refR-42] https://academic.oup.com/applij/article-abstract/8/2/95/153392?redirectedFrom=fulltextGoogle Scholar ↗